Mark H. Stone

2.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
50 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Mark H. Stone is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark H. Stone has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Clinical Psychology, 9 papers in Education and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark H. Stone's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (4 papers). Mark H. Stone is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (4 papers). Mark H. Stone collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Mark H. Stone's co-authors include Benjamin D. Wright, Steven Muncer, Carrie Allison, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Sally Wheelwright, Paúl F. Lazarsfeld, Rebecca Turner, A. Jackson Stenner, Elizabeth H. Thompson and William Fisher and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American Statistical Association and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Mark H. Stone

43 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Best test design 1979 2026 1994 2010 1979 1979 250 500 750 1000
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. Best test design
    1979 1.0k citations Mark H. Stone et al. profile →
  2. Best Test Design. Rasch Measurement.
    1979 497 citations Mark H. Stone et al. profile →

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Mark H. Stone 492 473 295 293 243 50 2.0k
Geofferey N. Masters 511 1.0× 609 1.3× 330 1.1× 193 0.7× 169 0.7× 23 2.1k
J M Linacre 314 0.6× 388 0.8× 253 0.9× 319 1.1× 440 1.8× 14 2.6k
Christine E. DeMars 817 1.7× 622 1.3× 375 1.3× 234 0.8× 146 0.6× 72 2.1k
Randall D. Penfield 585 1.2× 693 1.5× 488 1.7× 262 0.9× 64 0.3× 68 2.1k
R. Philip Chalmers 778 1.6× 304 0.6× 214 0.7× 519 1.8× 131 0.5× 31 2.4k
John T. Willse 326 0.7× 291 0.6× 187 0.6× 237 0.8× 87 0.4× 34 2.0k
Tammi Vacha‐Haase 376 0.8× 359 0.8× 266 0.9× 602 2.1× 125 0.5× 50 2.5k
Holmes Finch 375 0.8× 262 0.6× 180 0.6× 380 1.3× 68 0.3× 62 2.0k
DE Ayala 318 0.6× 286 0.6× 193 0.7× 221 0.8× 45 0.2× 4 1.3k
George Engelhard 1.0k 2.1× 1.2k 2.6× 523 1.8× 194 0.7× 92 0.4× 134 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark H. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark H. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark H. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark H. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark H. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark H. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark H. Stone. The network helps show where Mark H. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark H. Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark H. Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark H. Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark H. Stone. Mark H. Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stenner, A. Jackson, Mark H. Stone, & William Fisher. (2018). The unreasonable effectiveness of theory based instrument calibration in the natural sciences: What can the social sciences learn?. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1044. 12070–12070. 3 indexed citations
2.
Stone, Mark H.. (2016). The Role of Group Members in Facilitating Treatment. 4(6). 270–276. 1 indexed citations
3.
Allison, Carrie, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Mark H. Stone, & Steven Muncer. (2015). Rasch Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) Scale. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 18. E16–E16. 10 indexed citations
4.
Stone, Mark H. & A. Jackson Stenner. (2014). Comparison is key.. PubMed. 15(1). 26–39. 3 indexed citations
5.
Stenner, A. Jackson, William Fisher, Mark H. Stone, & Donald S. Burdick. (2013). Causal Rasch models. Frontiers in Psychology. 4. 536–536. 43 indexed citations
6.
Adams, John W., Mark H. Stone, Robert D. Vincent, & Steven Muncer. (2011). The Role of Syllables in Anagram Solution: A Rasch Analysis. The Journal of General Psychology. 138(2). 94–109. 7 indexed citations
7.
Allison, Carrie, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Sally Wheelwright, Mark H. Stone, & Steven Muncer. (2011). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ). Personality and Individual Differences. 51(7). 829–835. 119 indexed citations
8.
Turner, Rebecca, et al.. (2009). Emerging HE cultures: perspectives from CETL award holders in a partner college network. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 33(3). 255–263. 11 indexed citations
9.
Turner, Rebecca, et al.. (2009). ‘Square peg – round hole’: the emerging professional identities of HE in FE lecturers working in a partner college network in south‐west England. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 14(4). 355–368. 28 indexed citations
10.
Stone, Mark H., et al.. (2008). The Efficacy of Adult Christian Support Groups in Coping with the Death of a Significant Loved One. Journal of Religion and Health. 48(3). 305–316. 7 indexed citations
11.
Peters, Mike, et al.. (2007). A knowledge management approach to developing communities of practice amongst university and college staff. ASCILITE Publications. 1099–1103. 8 indexed citations
12.
Freeman, Arthur, et al.. (2005). Comparative treatments for borderline personality disorder. Springer eBooks. 6 indexed citations
13.
Stone, Mark H., et al.. (2004). The effect of sample size for estimating Rasch/IRT parameters with dichotomous items.. PubMed. 5(1). 48–61. 18 indexed citations
14.
Stone, Mark H.. (2003). Understanding Rasch Measurement: Substantive Scale Construction.. 4(3). 2 indexed citations
15.
Stone, Mark H. & Elizabeth H. Thompson. (2001). Executive function impairment in sexual offenders.. ˜The œjournal of individual psychology. 23 indexed citations
16.
Stone, Mark H.. (2000). Large-Scale Post-Crisis Corporate Sector Restructuring. 2000(7). 1–1. 13 indexed citations
17.
Stone, Mark H., et al.. (2000). Applying Relapse Intervention Strategies to Habitual Health Problems in the Family. The Family Journal. 8(2). 187–191. 1 indexed citations
18.
Stone, Mark H.. (2000). Thurstone's Crime Scale Re-Visited.. 3(1). 53–54. 1 indexed citations
19.
Stone, Mark H., et al.. (1994). A Sociometric Test to Identify Emergent Leader and Member Roles: Phase I. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 44(1). 79–100. 3 indexed citations
20.
Stone, Mark H., et al.. (1994). The Structure of Yalom's Curative Factors Scale. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 44(2). 239–245. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Geofferey N. Masters Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J M Linacre Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christine E. DeMars Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Randall D. Penfield Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Philip Chalmers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John T. Willse Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tammi Vacha‐Haase Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Holmes Finch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by DE Ayala Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by George Engelhard
Rankless by CCL
2026