W. Schupp

2.3k total citations
52 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

W. Schupp is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Epidemiology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, W. Schupp has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Rehabilitation, 20 papers in Epidemiology and 11 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in W. Schupp's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (29 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (18 papers) and Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (9 papers). W. Schupp is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (29 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (18 papers) and Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (9 papers). W. Schupp collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and United Kingdom. W. Schupp's co-authors include Liesbet De Wit, W. Jenni, Koen Putman, Eddy Dejaeger, Hilde Feys, Willy De Weerdt, Birgit Schuback, Nadine Brinkmann, Nadina B. Lincoln and Ralf Schmidt and has published in prestigious journals such as Stroke, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Cortex.

In The Last Decade

W. Schupp

49 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W. Schupp Germany 17 915 545 406 183 174 52 1.2k
Liesbet De Wit Belgium 21 1.1k 1.2× 606 1.1× 535 1.3× 252 1.4× 244 1.4× 28 1.5k
Birgitta Langhammer Norway 21 886 1.0× 505 0.9× 505 1.2× 282 1.5× 278 1.6× 78 1.4k
W. Jenni Belgium 14 694 0.8× 413 0.8× 299 0.7× 145 0.8× 149 0.9× 22 930
Gillian Baer United Kingdom 15 793 0.9× 270 0.5× 423 1.0× 207 1.1× 316 1.8× 35 1.1k
Fiona Nouri United Kingdom 14 473 0.5× 293 0.5× 307 0.8× 75 0.4× 198 1.1× 33 913
Kim Brock Australia 18 542 0.6× 299 0.5× 311 0.8× 115 0.6× 91 0.5× 49 801
Sara Hayes Ireland 16 541 0.6× 272 0.5× 299 0.7× 109 0.6× 230 1.3× 38 1.1k
Hanna Persson Sweden 19 663 0.7× 309 0.6× 365 0.9× 513 2.8× 53 0.3× 65 1.2k
Fiona M. Collen United Kingdom 6 995 1.1× 339 0.6× 718 1.8× 280 1.5× 492 2.8× 7 1.4k
Carin Willén Sweden 20 717 0.8× 138 0.3× 437 1.1× 249 1.4× 304 1.7× 33 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by W. Schupp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Schupp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Schupp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Schupp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Schupp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Schupp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Schupp. The network helps show where W. Schupp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Schupp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Schupp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Schupp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Schupp. W. Schupp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Geidl, Wolfgang, et al.. (2018). Measuring stroke patients’ exercise preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Neurology International. 10(1). 6993–6993. 17 indexed citations
2.
Putman, Koen, Liesbet De Wit, Eddy Dejaeger, et al.. (2016). A comparative study of medication use after stroke in four countries. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 148. 96–104. 3 indexed citations
3.
Huang, Jia, Michael A. McCaskey, Shanli Yang, et al.. (2015). Effects of acupuncture and computer-assisted cognitive training for post-stroke attention deficits: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 16(1). 546–546. 14 indexed citations
4.
Schmidt, Ralf, et al.. (2015). Predictors of health-related quality of life in stroke patients after neurological inpatient rehabilitation: a prospective study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 13(1). 58–58. 59 indexed citations
5.
Stummer, Christian, Geert Verheyden, Koen Putman, et al.. (2014). Predicting sickness impact profile at six months after stroke: further results from the European multi-center CERISE study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 37(11). 942–950. 6 indexed citations
6.
Wit, Liesbet De, Koen Putman, Hannes Devos, et al.. (2013). Long-term prediction of functional outcome after stroke using single items of the Barthel Index at discharge from rehabilitation centre. Disability and Rehabilitation. 36(5). 353–358. 34 indexed citations
7.
Wit, Liesbet De, Koen Putman, Hannes Devos, et al.. (2012). Five-year mortality and related prognostic factors after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: A European multi-centre study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 44(7). 547–552. 37 indexed citations
8.
Steib, Simon & W. Schupp. (2011). Therapiestrategien in der Schlaganfallnachsorge. Der Nervenarzt. 83(4). 467–475. 6 indexed citations
9.
Schupp, W.. (2011). DGRW-Update: Neurologie – Von empirischen Strategien hin zu evidenzbasierten Interventionen. Die Rehabilitation. 50(6). 354–362. 2 indexed citations
10.
11.
Dimova, Violeta, et al.. (2009). Eine Therapiestudie zur Behandlung des visuellen Neglekts mittels Prismenadaptation. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie. 20(4). 271–284. 2 indexed citations
12.
Putman, Koen, Liesbet De Wit, W. Schupp, et al.. (2009). Variations in follow-up services after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: A multicentre study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 41(8). 646–653. 22 indexed citations
13.
Schröder, Christina, et al.. (2007). Computer-aided therapy in aphasia therapy: evaluation of assignment criteria. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 30(4). 289–295. 9 indexed citations
14.
Putman, Koen, Liesbet De Wit, W. Schupp, et al.. (2007). Inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a comparative study of admission criteria to stroke rehabilitation units in four European centres. Acta Dermato Venereologica. 39(1). 21–26. 48 indexed citations
15.
Verheyden, Geert, Alice Nieuwboer, Liesbet De Wit, et al.. (2006). Trunk performance on admission to the rehabilitation setting is a significant predictor of Barthel index score at 6 months after stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 21. 5. 1 indexed citations
16.
Putman, Koen, Liesbet De Wit, W. Schupp, et al.. (2006). Use of time by physiotherapists and occupational therapists in a stroke rehabilitation unit: A comparison between four European rehabilitation centres. Disability and Rehabilitation. 28(22). 1417–1424. 31 indexed citations
17.
Verheyden, Geert, Alice Nieuwboer, Liesbet De Wit, et al.. (2006). Trunk performance after stroke: an eye catching predictor of functional outcome. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 78(7). 694–698. 162 indexed citations
18.
Haase, Ingo, et al.. (2006). Factors contributing to patient satisfaction with medical rehabilitation in German hospitals. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 29(4). 289–294. 15 indexed citations
19.
20.
Schupp, W.. (1995). [Concept for a functional status and handicap-adjustment treatment and rehabilitation service chain in neurologic and neurosurgical management in Germany ("phase model")].. PubMed. 66(12). 907–14. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Liesbet De Wit Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Birgitta Langhammer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W. Jenni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gillian Baer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fiona Nouri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kim Brock Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sara Hayes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hanna Persson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fiona M. Collen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carin Willén
Rankless by CCL
2026