Liesbet De Wit
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Neurology top 5%
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 2%
- Co-authors
- Willy De WeerdtKoen PutmanW. SchuppHilde FeysW. JenniEddy DejaegerGeert VerheydenAlice Nieuwboer
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (21 papers)Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (18 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers)
- Cited by
- RehabilitationPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationPsychiatry and Mental health
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Liesbet De Wit
27 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Rehabilitation 1.1k
- Epidemiology 606
- Psychiatry and Mental health 535
- Neurology 252
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 244
Countries citing papers authored by Liesbet De Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of Liesbet De Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liesbet De Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liesbet De Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liesbet De Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liesbet De Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liesbet De Wit. The network helps show where Liesbet De Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liesbet De Wit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liesbet De Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liesbet De Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liesbet De Wit. Liesbet De Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 101 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 85 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | Trunk performance on admission to the rehabilitation setting is a significant predictor of Barthel index score at 6 months after stroke | 1 |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 162 | |
| 20 | 57 |
About Liesbet De Wit
Liesbet De Wit is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Epidemiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (21 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (18 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (1.1k citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (244 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (535 citations). Liesbet De Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Willy De Weerdt, Koen Putman, W. Schupp, Hilde Feys, W. Jenni, Eddy Dejaeger, Geert Verheyden, Alice Nieuwboer, Vincent Thijs and Birgit Schuback. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Journal of Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.