Peter Lobel
Impact in
- Physiology top 0.1%
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
- Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
- Cell Biology top 0.2%
- Cellular transport and secretion
Papers in
- Physiology 20
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research 69
- Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism 18
- Cell Biology 58
- Cellular transport and secretion 57
- Co-authors
- David E. SleatIstván SohárStuart KornfeldNancy DahmsHenry LacklandMichel JadotAnn StockMarie T. Vanier
- Journals
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (22 papers)Biochemical Journal (9 papers)Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (7 papers)Molecular Therapy (7 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumGermany
In The Last Decade
Peter Lobel
102 papers receiving 7.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Physiology 1.1k
- Cell Biology 2.9k
- Physiology 4.3k
- Molecular Biology 3.7k
- Neurology 336
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lobel
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lobel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lobel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lobel. The network helps show where Peter Lobel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lobel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 60 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 215 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 72 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 171 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 163 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 99 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 64 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 84 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 119 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 68 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 100 |
About Peter Lobel
Peter Lobel is a scholar working on Physiology, Cell Biology, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 102 papers that have together received 7.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (69 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (57 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (30 papers), Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism (18 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (14 papers), Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus (6 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (5 papers) and Galectins and Cancer Biology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.1k citations), Cell Biology (2.9k citations), Physiology (4.3k citations), Molecular Biology (3.7k citations) and Neurology (336 citations). Peter Lobel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David E. Sleat, István Sohár, Stuart Kornfeld, Nancy Dahms, Henry Lackland, Michel Jadot, Ann Stock, Marie T. Vanier, Anthony H. Fensom and Saule Naureckiene. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochemical Journal, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Molecular Therapy and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.