Peter Kivy
Impact in
- Music top 0.1%
- Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Diverse Music Education Insights
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Papers in
- Music 32
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 30
- Diverse Music Education Insights 5
- Diverse Musicological Studies 4
-
- Visual Culture and Art Theory 5
- Co-authors
- Douglas DempsterMalcolm BuddStephen DaviesJohn HospersSteve Sweeney‐TurnerKingsley PriceRobert W. EarlEdward L. Walker
- Journals
- Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (33 papers)The British Journal of Aesthetics (10 papers)Notes (6 papers)The Monist (4 papers)The Philosophical Review (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Peter Kivy
103 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Music 538
- Cognitive Neuroscience 759
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 387
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 131
- Philosophy 214
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kivy
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kivy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kivy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kivy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kivy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kivy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kivy. The network helps show where Peter Kivy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Kivy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 27 | |
| 4 | The Possessor and the Possessed: Handel, Mozart, Beethoven, and the Idea of Musical Genius | 2001 | 19 |
| 5 | On the Banality of Literary Truths | 1997 | 4 |
| 6 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 56 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 3 | |
| 13 | Platonism in Music: Another Kind of Defense | 1987 | 26 |
| 14 | 1986 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1964 | 3 |
About Peter Kivy
Peter Kivy is a scholar working on Music, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History and Philosophy of Science, Museology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 122 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (30 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (10 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (6 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (5 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (5 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (538 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (759 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (387 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (131 citations) and Philosophy (214 citations). Peter Kivy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Douglas Dempster, Malcolm Budd, Stephen Davies, John Hospers, Steve Sweeney‐Turner, Kingsley Price, Robert W. Earl, Edward L. Walker, Francis Hutcheson and Richard Taruskin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The British Journal of Aesthetics, Notes, The Monist and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.