This map shows the geographic impact of John Hospers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hospers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hospers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hospers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hospers. The network helps show where John Hospers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Hospers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Hospers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Hospers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Hospers. John Hospers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hospers, John. (1990). Justice as part of an ethical theory. Oxford University Press eBooks. 35–44.1 indexed citations
Hospers, John, et al.. (1986). Scripta signa vocis : studies about scripts, scriptures, scribes, and languages in the Near East, presented to J.H. Hospers by his pupils, colleagues, and friends.2 indexed citations
4.
Hospers, John. (1985). Artistic Creativity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 43(3). 243–243.10 indexed citations
5.
Hospers, John. (1982). Understanding the arts. Medical Entomology and Zoology.11 indexed citations
Hospers, John, et al.. (1953). An Introduction to Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 11(3). 271–271.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.