Malcolm Budd
Impact in
- Music top 1%
- Diverse Music Education Insights
- Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Philosophy top 1%
- Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Papers in
- Philosophy 16
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 6
- Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art 6
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
-
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 4
- Co-authors
- Peter Kivy (2 shared papers)Anthony Kenny (1 shared paper)Eileen John (1 shared paper)Bruce Vermazen (1 shared paper)Minna Tanner (1 shared paper)John Sloboda (1 shared paper)Michael Kelly (1 shared paper)Colin McGinn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The British Journal of Aesthetics (14 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (4 papers)The Journal of Philosophy (3 papers)Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (3 papers)Mind (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Malcolm Budd
39 papers receiving 446 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Music 123
- Philosophy 166
- Cognitive Neuroscience 253
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 163
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 54
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Budd
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Budd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Budd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Budd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Budd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Budd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Budd. The network helps show where Malcolm Budd may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Budd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 85 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 38 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 36 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 33 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 16 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 8 |
About Malcolm Budd
Malcolm Budd is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Music and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (6 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (6 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (5 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (5 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (123 citations), Philosophy (166 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (253 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (163 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (54 citations). Malcolm Budd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter Kivy, Anthony Kenny, Eileen John, Bruce Vermazen, Minna Tanner, John Sloboda, Michael Kelly, Colin McGinn, Lydia Goehr and Jerrold Levinson. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Aesthetics, The Philosophical Quarterly, The Journal of Philosophy, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and Mind.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.