Peter J. Neufeld
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Law top 1%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Barry ScheckJim DwyerBrandon L. GarrettNeville ColmanConstantine GatsonisMichael BromwichHarry EdwardsSteven A. Drizin
- Topics
- Criminal Law and Evidence (5 papers)Jury Decision Making Processes (3 papers)Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Peter J. Neufeld
12 papers receiving 461 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Social Psychology 217
- Sociology and Political Science 159
- Cognitive Neuroscience 137
- Law 118
- Clinical Psychology 90
Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Neufeld
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Neufeld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Neufeld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Neufeld more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Neufeld
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Neufeld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Neufeld. The network helps show where Peter J. Neufeld may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter J. Neufeld
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter J. Neufeld. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter J. Neufeld based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter J. Neufeld. Peter J. Neufeld is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Promoting Accuracy in the Use of Confession Evidence: An Argument for Pre-Trial Reliability Assessments to Prevent Wrongful Convictions | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions | 77 |
| 5 | Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community | 59 |
| 6 | Bringing Reliability Back in: False Confessions and Legal Safeguards in the Twenty-First Century | 7 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | Toward the formation of "Innocence Commissions" in America | 13 |
| 10 | Actual Innocence : Five Days to Execution and Other Dispatches from the Wrongly Convicted | 194 |
| 11 | Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make it Right | 111 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 37 |
About Peter J. Neufeld
Peter J. Neufeld is a scholar working on Law, Pharmacy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 13 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Evidence (5 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (3 papers) and Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (118 citations), Social Psychology (217 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (137 citations). Peter J. Neufeld has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Barry Scheck, Jim Dwyer, Brandon L. Garrett, Neville Colman, Constantine Gatsonis, Michael Bromwich, Harry Edwards, Steven A. Drizin and Richard A. Leo. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, American Journal of Public Health and Scientific American.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.