Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Declining Significance of Race: Blacks and Changing American Institutions.
This map shows the geographic impact of Harry Edwards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harry Edwards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harry Edwards more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harry Edwards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harry Edwards. The network helps show where Harry Edwards may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harry Edwards
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harry Edwards.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harry Edwards based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Harry Edwards. Harry Edwards is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Edwards, Harry & Michael A. Livermore. (2009). Pitfalls of Empirical Studies That Attempt to Understand the Factors Affecting Appellate Decisionmaking. Duke Law Journal. 58(8). 1895–1989.21 indexed citations
3.
Edwards, Harry. (2004). A Conversation with Judge Harry T. Edwards. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 16(1). 61–80.1 indexed citations
4.
Edwards, Harry. (2002). Race and the Judiciary. Yale law & policy review. 20(2). 5.2 indexed citations
5.
Edwards, Harry, et al.. (2002). Beware of Numbers (and Unsupported Claims of Judicial Bias). Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 80(3). 723–738.2 indexed citations
6.
Edwards, Harry. (1998). An End of the Golden Age of Black Participation in Sport. 3(1). 18.5 indexed citations
7.
Edwards, Harry. (1994). Another "Postscript" to "the Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession". Washington law review. 69(3). 561.3 indexed citations
8.
Edwards, Harry. (1988). The Role of Legal Education in Shaping the Profession.. Journal of legal education. 38(3).2 indexed citations
9.
Edwards, Harry. (1984). Perspectives on Olympic Sport Politics: 1968-1984. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 9(1).
10.
Edwards, Harry. (1984). The Black "Dumb Jock": An American Sports Tragedy.. The College Board review.72 indexed citations
11.
Edwards, Harry. (1984). The Role of a Judge in Modern Society: Some Reflections on Current Practice in Federal Appellate Adjudication. Cleveland State law review. 32(3). 385.6 indexed citations
12.
Edwards, Harry. (1982). Race in Contemporary American Sports.. 62(1). 19–22.7 indexed citations
13.
Edwards, Harry. (1982). On the Issue of Race in Contemporary American Sports.. The Western journal of black studies. 6(3).2 indexed citations
14.
Edwards, Harry. (1980). Higher Education and the Unholy Crusade Against Governmental Regulation.. eYLS (Yale Law School).4 indexed citations
Edwards, Harry & James J. White. (1977). Problems, readings, and materials on the lawyer as a negotiator. eYLS (Yale Law School).2 indexed citations
18.
Edwards, Harry. (1977). The Coming of Age of the Burger Court: Labor Law Decisions of The Supreme Court During the 1976 Term. Boston College law review. 19(1). 1.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.