Joanna Pozzulo
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Law top 0.5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- R. C. L. LindsayJulie DempseyKelly L. WarrenAlberta GirardiEvelyn M. MaederKang LeeWendy CraigLaura B. Allen
- Topics
- Deception detection and forensic psychology (44 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (43 papers)Jury Decision Making Processes (30 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Joanna Pozzulo
83 papers receiving 965 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Cognitive Neuroscience 679
- Social Psychology 544
- Law 183
- Gender Studies 162
- Sociology and Political Science 152
Countries citing papers authored by Joanna Pozzulo
This map shows the geographic impact of Joanna Pozzulo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanna Pozzulo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanna Pozzulo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joanna Pozzulo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanna Pozzulo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanna Pozzulo. The network helps show where Joanna Pozzulo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanna Pozzulo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanna Pozzulo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanna Pozzulo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanna Pozzulo. Joanna Pozzulo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | Does speed indicate lineup identification accuracy? Examining children's and adults' reaction time | 1 |
| 17 | When witness factors interact with crime type: Influences on jurors' perceptions and verdicts. | 1 |
| 18 | Identification accuracy of eyewitnesses for a multiple perpetrator crime: Examining the simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures | 9 |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 111 |
About Joanna Pozzulo
Joanna Pozzulo is a scholar working on Law, Gender Studies and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1000 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (44 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (43 papers) and Jury Decision Making Processes (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (679 citations), Social Psychology (544 citations) and Law (183 citations). Joanna Pozzulo has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. C. L. Lindsay, Julie Dempsey, Kelly L. Warren, Alberta Girardi, Evelyn M. Maeder, Kang Lee, Wendy Craig, Laura B. Allen, Rod C. L. Lindsay and Jennifer E. Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Child Abuse & Neglect.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.