Peter Freytag

26 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Freytag
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • General Decision Sciences 244
  • Applied Psychology 143
  • Social Psychology 406
  • Communication 113
  • Sociology and Political Science 627
Replace Hans‐Peter Erb with:
Hans‐Peter Erb Germany
Matthew J. Lindberg United States
George A. Quattrone United States
Philip M. Fernbach United States
Scott C. Fraser United States
Paget H. Gross United States
Carl R. Jones United States
Robyn A. LeBoeuf United States
Donnel A. Briley Australia
Lori Sheppard United States
Peter Freytag relative to Hans‐Peter Erb Germany Hans‐Peter Erb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Hans‐Peter Erb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Freytag

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Freytag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Freytag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Freytag more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Freytag

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Freytag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Freytag. The network helps show where Peter Freytag may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Freytag, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Freytag Line = papers co-authored together Peter Freytag links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998411
2 2005267
3
Stereotype dynamics : language-based approaches to the formation, maintenance, and transformation of stereotypes
200878
4 200257
5 200953
6 199839
7 200434
8 200734
9 200726
10 199922
11 200321
12 200817
13 201114
14 200913
15 201113
16 201113
17 200212
18 201012
19 20138
20 20157

About Peter Freytag

Peter Freytag is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (244 citations), Applied Psychology (143 citations), Social Psychology (406 citations), Communication (113 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (627 citations). Peter Freytag has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Fiedler, Stefan Stürmer, Michael Loewy, Claudia Kampmeier, Bernd Simon, Thorsten Meiser, Christian Unkelbach, Yoshihisa Kashima, Eva Walther and Tobias Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Memory & Cognition, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Cognition & Emotion and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact