Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.
1994578 citationsMike Oaksford, Nick ChaterPsychological Reviewprofile →
A temporal ratio model of memory.
2007576 citationsNick Chater et al.Psychological Reviewprofile →
Language as shaped by the brain
2008533 citationsMorten H. Christiansen, Nick Chaterprofile →
Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning
2007442 citationsMike Oaksford, Nick ChaterMedical Entomology and Zoologyprofile →
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
2015391 citationsMorten H. Christiansen, Nick Chaterprofile →
The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Chater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Chater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Chater more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Chater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Chater. The network helps show where Nick Chater may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Chater
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Chater.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Chater based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Chater. Nick Chater is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
León-Villagrá, Pablo, et al.. (2021). Local sampling with momentum accounts for human random sequence generation. Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick). 43(43).1 indexed citations
Janssen, Christian P., et al.. (2010). A cognitively bounded rational analysis model of dual-task performance trade-offs. UCL Discovery (University College London).
6.
Oaksford, Mike & Nick Chater. (2007). Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 11. rbae063–rbae063.442 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Chater, Nick, Josh Tenenbaum, & Alan Yuille. (2006). Probabilistic models of cognition. Special Issue.. UCL Discovery (University College London).6 indexed citations
Hahn, Ulrike, et al.. (2001). Similarity: A Transformational Approach. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23).1 indexed citations
13.
Christiansen, Morten H., et al.. (1999). Special issue - Connectionist models of human language processing: Progress and prospects. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
Chater, Nick, Martin Redington, Ramin Charles Nakisa, & Mike Oaksford. (1997). Rationality the Fast and Frugal Way. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
16.
Hahn, Ulrike, et al.. (1996). Weighting in Similarity Judgements: Investigating the "MAX Hypothesis". UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
17.
Chater, Nick, et al.. (1995). Connectionist modelling: Implications for neuropsychology. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
18.
Redington, Martin, Nick Chater, & Steven Finch. (1993). DISTRIBUTIONAL INFORMATION AND THE ACQUISITION OF LINGUISTIC CATEGORIES - A STATISTICAL APPROACH. UCL Discovery (University College London).9 indexed citations
19.
Finch, Steven & Nick Chater. (1992). BOOTSTRAPPING SYNTACTIC CATEGORIES. UCL Discovery (University College London).18 indexed citations
20.
Chater, Nick & Giorgio Ganis. (1991). DOUBLE DISSOCIATION AND ISOLABLE COGNITIVE-PROCESSES. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.