Peter Cock

13.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
59 papers, 7.4k citations indexed

About

Peter Cock is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Cock has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 7.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Plant Science, 25 papers in Molecular Biology and 9 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Peter Cock's work include Nematode management and characterization studies (16 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (16 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (13 papers). Peter Cock is often cited by papers focused on Nematode management and characterization studies (16 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (16 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (13 papers). Peter Cock collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Peter Cock's co-authors include Brad Chapman, Thomas Hamelryck, Andrew Dalke, Cymon J. Cox, Bartek Wilczyński, Tiago Antão, Frank Kauff, Michiel de Hoon, Jeffrey T. Chang and Iddo Friedberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Bioinformatics and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Peter Cock

58 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Hit Papers

Biopython: freely available Python tools for computationa... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 2009 2012 1000 2.0k 3.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Cock United Kingdom 24 4.4k 2.2k 1.0k 985 480 59 7.4k
Penelope Coggill United States 5 5.9k 1.3× 2.7k 1.2× 1.3k 1.3× 1.0k 1.1× 395 0.8× 8 8.9k
Konstantin Berlin United States 11 3.5k 0.8× 2.0k 0.9× 1.0k 1.0× 694 0.7× 360 0.8× 19 6.0k
Lorna Richardson United Kingdom 15 5.3k 1.2× 2.4k 1.1× 1.2k 1.1× 849 0.9× 322 0.7× 31 7.8k
Renata C. Geer United States 10 3.9k 0.9× 1.9k 0.9× 828 0.8× 653 0.7× 334 0.7× 12 6.4k
Noreen R. Gonzales United States 14 4.3k 1.0× 2.1k 1.0× 867 0.8× 640 0.6× 344 0.7× 18 6.8k
Ian Longden United Kingdom 2 4.7k 1.1× 1.7k 0.8× 1.2k 1.2× 1.1k 1.1× 341 0.7× 2 7.3k
Lisanna Paladin Italy 11 5.3k 1.2× 2.4k 1.1× 1.1k 1.0× 815 0.8× 313 0.7× 17 7.6k
David Binns United Kingdom 8 4.6k 1.0× 2.2k 1.0× 1.3k 1.2× 981 1.0× 509 1.1× 9 7.5k
Maxim Scheremetjew United Kingdom 6 3.7k 0.8× 2.1k 0.9× 1.4k 1.3× 841 0.9× 486 1.0× 10 6.4k
Frank Wright United Kingdom 26 3.7k 0.8× 1.9k 0.9× 736 0.7× 1.1k 1.1× 400 0.8× 59 6.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Cock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Cock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cock. The network helps show where Peter Cock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Cock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Cock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Cock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Cock. Peter Cock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cooke, David E. L., Louise Barwell, Bethan V. Purse, et al.. (2025). The prevalence of Phytophthora in British plant nurseries; high‐risk hosts and substrates and opportunities to implement best practice. Plant Pathology. 74(3). 696–717. 2 indexed citations
2.
Cooke, David E. L., Ivan Milenković, Zoltán Á. Nagy, et al.. (2024). Hidden Phytophthora diversity unveiled in tree nurseries of the Czech Republic with traditional and metabarcoding techniques. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 170(1). 131–156. 7 indexed citations
3.
Bray, Simon, John Chilton, Matthias Bernt, et al.. (2023). The Planemo toolkit for developing, deploying, and executing scientific data analyses in Galaxy and beyond. Genome Research. 33(2). 261–268. 4 indexed citations
4.
Hedley, Pete E., et al.. (2023). Phytophthora in Horticultural Nursery Green Waste—A Risk to Plant Health. Horticulturae. 9(6). 616–616. 7 indexed citations
5.
Véronneau, Pierre‐Yves, Peter Thorpe, Peter Cock, et al.. (2020). The Genomic Impact of Selection for Virulence against Resistance in the Potato Cyst Nematode, Globodera pallida. Genes. 11(12). 1429–1429. 11 indexed citations
7.
Pritchard, Leighton, et al.. (2019). widdowquinn/pyani: v0.2.8. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 15 indexed citations
8.
Thorpe, Peter, Carmen Escudero-Martinez, Peter Cock, Sebastian Eves‐van den Akker, & Jorunn I. B. Bos. (2018). Shared Transcriptional Control and Disparate Gain and Loss of Aphid Parasitism Genes. Genome Biology and Evolution. 10(10). 2716–2733. 42 indexed citations
9.
Harris, Nomi L., Peter Cock, Hilmar Lapp, et al.. (2016). The 2015 Bioinformatics Open Source Conference (BOSC 2015). PLoS Computational Biology. 12(2). e1004691–e1004691. 2 indexed citations
10.
Palomares‐Rius, Juan E., Pete E. Hedley, Peter Cock, et al.. (2016). Gene expression changes in diapause or quiescent potato cyst nematode,Globodera pallida, eggs after hydration or exposure to tomato root diffusate. PeerJ. 4. e1654–e1654. 8 indexed citations
11.
Cock, Peter, John Chilton, Björn Grüning, James E. Johnson, & Nicola Soranzo. (2015). NCBI BLAST+ integrated into Galaxy. GigaScience. 4(1). 39–39. 187 indexed citations
12.
13.
Thorpe, Peter, Sophie Mantelin, Peter Cock, et al.. (2014). Genomic characterisation of the effector complement of the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida. BMC Genomics. 15(1). 923–923. 56 indexed citations
14.
Akker, Sebastian Eves‐van den, Catherine J. Lilley, Étienne Danchin, et al.. (2014). The Transcriptome of Nacobbus aberrans Reveals Insights into the Evolution of Sedentary Endoparasitism in Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. Genome Biology and Evolution. 6(9). 2181–2194. 34 indexed citations
15.
Harris, Nomi L., et al.. (2014). The Bioinformatics Open Source Conference (BOSC) 2013. Bioinformatics. 31(2). 299–300. 2 indexed citations
16.
Möller, Steffen, Enis Afgan, Peter Cock, et al.. (2013). Sprints, Hackathons and Codefests as community gluons in computational biology. EMBnet journal. 19(B). 40–40. 2 indexed citations
17.
Jupe, Florian, Leighton Pritchard, Graham Etherington, et al.. (2012). Identification and localisation of the NB-LRR gene family within the potato genome. BMC Genomics. 13(1). 75–75. 234 indexed citations
18.
Talevich, Eric, Brandon M. Invergo, Peter Cock, & Brad Chapman. (2012). Bio.Phylo: A unified toolkit for processing, analyzing and visualizing phylogenetic trees in Biopython. BMC Bioinformatics. 13(1). 209–209. 103 indexed citations
19.
Swanson, Maud M., B. Reavy, Kira S. Makarova, et al.. (2012). Novel Bacteriophages Containing a Genome of Another Bacteriophage within Their Genomes. PLoS ONE. 7(7). e40683–e40683. 35 indexed citations
20.
McNally, Randall, Ian K. Toth, Peter Cock, et al.. (2011). Genetic characterization of the HrpL regulon of the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora reveals novel virulence factors. Molecular Plant Pathology. 13(2). 160–173. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026