James B Procter
Impact in
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- RNA Research and Splicing
- Aging top 2%
Papers in
- Aging 1
-
- Scientific Computing and Data Management 3
- Co-authors
- Geoffrey J. BartonAndrew WaterhouseDavid MartinMichèle ClampChristian ColePeter V TroshinBurkhard RostDaniel L. Barton
- Journals
- Bioinformatics (4 papers)Nature Methods (2 papers)The EMBO Journal (2 papers)BMC Bioinformatics (2 papers)Nucleic Acids Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
James B Procter
18 papers receiving 9.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
- Molecular Biology 6.3k
- Aging 105
- Endocrinology 300
- Cell Biology 891
- Genetics 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by James B Procter
This map shows the geographic impact of James B Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James B Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James B Procter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James B Procter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James B Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James B Procter. The network helps show where James B Procter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James B Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 113 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 129 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 135 | |
| 11 | JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 1316 |
| 12 | 2011 | 104 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 92 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 59 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 92 | |
| 16 | Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 7369 |
| 17 | 2006 | 37 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 41 |
About James B Procter
James B Procter is a scholar working on Aging, Information Systems and Management, Molecular Biology, Biophysics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 9.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (9 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (7 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (3 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (3 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (6.3k citations), Aging (105 citations), Endocrinology (300 citations), Cell Biology (891 citations) and Genetics (1.3k citations). James B Procter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey J. Barton, Andrew Waterhouse, David Martin, Michèle Clamp, Christian Cole, Peter V Troshin, Burkhard Rost, Daniel L. Barton, Andrew E. Torda and Julie Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Bioinformatics, Nature Methods, The EMBO Journal, BMC Bioinformatics and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.