Molecular Plant Pathology

2.2k papers and 101.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Molecular Plant Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 101.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Molecular Plant Pathology usually cover Plant Science (2.1k papers), Molecular Biology (625 papers) and Cell Biology (437 papers) specifically the topics of Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (1.3k papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (639 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (559 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Plant Pathology are Bart P. H. J. Thomma, J.A.L. van Kan, William E. Fry, K. E. Hammond‐Kosack, Harold Kistler, Gary D. Foster, Rubella S. Goswami, Maren A. Klich, Antonio Di Pietro and Brett M. Tyler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Molecular Plant Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Plant Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Plant Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Molecular Plant Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Plant Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Plant Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Plant Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025