Peter Cain

2.5k citations
61 papers · 941 indexed · h-index 17

Peter Cain

55 papers receiving 710 citations

Peers

Peter Cain
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Anthropology 164
  • Political Science and International Relations 274
  • Sociology and Political Science 506
  • History 119
  • Economics and Econometrics 276
Replace Lionel Rothkrug with:
Lionel Rothkrug Canada
D. K. Fieldhouse United Kingdom
Rondo Cameron United States
Patrick Karl O’Brien United Kingdom
Jacob M. Price United States
Charles Issawi United States
Jeremy Adelman United States
K. N. Chaudhuri United Kingdom
Jairus Banaji United Kingdom
Richard A. Lebrun Canada
Peter Cain relative to Lionel Rothkrug Canada Lionel Rothkrug's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Lionel Rothkrug · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Cain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Cain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cain. The network helps show where Peter Cain may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Peter Cain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Cain Line = papers co-authored together Peter Cain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20210
2
Writings on Imperialism and Internationalism
20130
3 20117
4 20103
5 20073
6 20031
7
Imperialism : critical concepts in historical studies
200113
8 199427
9
Innovation and expansion, 1688-1914
19931
10
Crisis and deconstruction, 1914-1990
19932
11 199221
12 19921
13
Budgeting the effects of adopting legume-based forage systems.
19901
14 198819
15 198762
16 198747
17 198517
18 198411
19 198016
20 19791

About Peter Cain

Peter Cain is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 61 papers that have together received 941 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (18 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (12 papers), Transport and Economic Policies (5 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (3 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (164 citations), Political Science and International Relations (274 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (506 citations). Peter Cain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. G. Hopkins, Lance E. Davis, Michael Havinden, David Meredith, Wolfgang J. Mommsen, Jürgen Osterhammel, Jack Simmons, Peter Harnetty, Norman Etherington and Mark Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, The Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History, The Economic Journal, History of Political Economy and The Journal of Transport History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026