K. N. Chaudhuri
- Anthropology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Demography top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ainslie T. EmbreeFrank SpoonerHolden FurberRalph DavisClive DeweyDavid WashbrookTapan RaychaudhuriGeorge Blyn
- Topics
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (15 papers)Colonialism, slavery, and trade (7 papers)Indian Economic and Social Development (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
K. N. Chaudhuri
35 papers receiving 749 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Anthropology 554
- Sociology and Political Science 451
- Economics and Econometrics 350
- Political Science and International Relations 232
- Demography 120
Countries citing papers authored by K. N. Chaudhuri
This map shows the geographic impact of K. N. Chaudhuri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. N. Chaudhuri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. N. Chaudhuri more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. N. Chaudhuri
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. N. Chaudhuri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. N. Chaudhuri. The network helps show where K. N. Chaudhuri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. N. Chaudhuri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. N. Chaudhuri. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. N. Chaudhuri based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. N. Chaudhuri. K. N. Chaudhuri is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 154 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | 129 | |
| 11 | Some Reflections on the World Trade of the XVIIth and XVIIIth Century:a Reply. | 1 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | The English East India Company : the study of an early joint-stock company 1600-1640 | 106 |
| 20 | 15 |
About K. N. Chaudhuri
K. N. Chaudhuri is a scholar working on Anthropology, Transportation and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (15 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (7 papers) and Indian Economic and Social Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (554 citations), Economics and Econometrics (350 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (451 citations). K. N. Chaudhuri has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Ainslie T. Embree, Frank Spooner, Holden Furber, Ralph Davis, Clive Dewey, David Washbrook, Tapan Raychaudhuri, George Blyn, Robert Olson and Claude Markovits. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, The American Historical Review and Pacific Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.