Peter Bishop

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
51 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Peter Bishop is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Bishop has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Peter Bishop's work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (6 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (4 papers) and Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers). Peter Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Complex Systems and Decision Making (6 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (4 papers) and Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers). Peter Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Peter Bishop's co-authors include Andy Hines, Lesley Williams, George Woodcock, David Ν. Βengston, Stefan Wuertz, Peter A. Wilderer, Susan Luckman, Jean Duruz, Derek L. Phillips and Laszlo Radvanyi and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Forces and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

In The Last Decade

Peter Bishop

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques

2007 532 citations Peter Bishop et al. foresight profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Bishop United States	14	316	213	208	123	117	51	1.2k
Joseph F. Coates United States	18	279 0.9×	287 1.3×	94 0.5×	86 0.7×	150 1.3×	152	1.4k
Lasse Gerrits Netherlands	19	415 1.3×	306 1.4×	156 0.8×	86 0.7×	74 0.6×	91	1.0k
John Stansbury United States	11	396 1.3×	100 0.5×	214 1.0×	126 1.0×	114 1.0×	35	1.5k
Harald A. Mieg Germany	17	241 0.8×	116 0.5×	169 0.8×	184 1.5×	161 1.4×	77	1.2k
Simon Bell United Kingdom	22	371 1.2×	401 1.9×	344 1.7×	477 3.9×	123 1.1×	86	1.8k
Igor Mayer Netherlands	25	519 1.6×	259 1.2×	287 1.4×	240 2.0×	56 0.5×	80	2.0k
Bert Enserink Netherlands	17	219 0.7×	149 0.7×	209 1.0×	217 1.8×	150 1.3×	54	1.1k
Peter G. Rowe United States	15	297 0.9×	107 0.5×	198 1.0×	48 0.4×	87 0.7×	46	2.1k
Lutz E. Schlange Switzerland	6	268 0.8×	507 2.4×	276 1.3×	128 1.0×	155 1.3×	8	1.5k
Angela Wilkinson United Kingdom	12	235 0.7×	238 1.1×	320 1.5×	84 0.7×	85 0.7×	31	883

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bishop

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bishop

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bishop. The network helps show where Peter Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Bishop. Peter Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Bishop, Peter. (2023). Temporary and tactical urbanism: (re)assembling urban space. Journal of Urban Design. 28(3). 352–353. 14 indexed citations

2.

Bishop, Peter & Lorraine Williams. (2020). Design for London: Experiments in urban thinking. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 3 indexed citations

3.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (2020). Innovative application of strategic foresight to oncology research. foresight. 22(5/6). 533–550. 7 indexed citations

4.

Jones, Peter, et al.. (2019). Track 5.g Introduction: Design with Foresight: Strategic Anticipation in Design Research. 2(1). 1 indexed citations

5.

Wuertz, Stefan, Peter Bishop, & Peter A. Wilderer. (2015). Biofilms in Wastewater Treatment: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Water Intelligence Online. 4(0). 2139869749–2139869749. 30 indexed citations

6.

Ahluwalia, Pal, Stephen R. Atkinson, Peter Bishop, et al.. (2012). Reconciliation and Pedagogy. Postcolonial Politics.. 1 indexed citations

7.

Βengston, David Ν., et al.. (2012). Strengthening Environmental Foresight: Potential Contributions of Futures Research. Ecology and Society. 17(2). 48 indexed citations

8.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (2011). Case Study: Futurizing the K-12 Teaching Practice. Journal of futures studies. 15(4). 181–187. 3 indexed citations

9.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (2010). Why Teach the Future. Journal of futures studies. 14(4). 99–106. 6 indexed citations

10.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (2010). Grey walls: advertising the retirement home. Australian journal of communication. 37(1). 37. 1 indexed citations

11.

Strong, Ray, Joseph B. Ryan, Eric G. Strauss, et al.. (2007). A New Way to Plan for the Future. ix. 230b–230b. 9 indexed citations

12.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (2002). Mental health matters: a multi‐family framework for mental health intervention. Journal of Family Therapy. 24(1). 31–45. 20 indexed citations

13.

Bishop, Peter. (2001). LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: LOCALS AND TOURISTS CROSS OVER THE SKYE BRIDGE. Studies in Travel Writing. 5(1). 149–171. 1 indexed citations

14.

Bishop, Peter. (1998). Tranmere Rovers Football Club. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

15.

Bishop, Peter. (1994). From anticipation to action: A handbook of strategic prospective. Futures. 26(4). 453–455. 54 indexed citations

16.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (1992). The Myth of Shangri-La: Tibet, Travel Writing and the Western Creation of Sacred Landscape. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 112(2). 349–349. 47 indexed citations

17.

Bishop, Peter. (1991). Constable country: diet, landscape and national identity. Landscape Research. 16(2). 31–36. 5 indexed citations

18.

Woodcock, George & Peter Bishop. (1990). The Myth of Shangri La: Tibet, Travel Writing and the Western Creation of Sacred Landscape.. Pacific Affairs. 63(2). 273–273. 53 indexed citations

19.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (1986). Factor Similarities Between Traditional Psychoeducational and Neuropsychological Test Batteries. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 4(1). 73–82. 7 indexed citations

20.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (1977). A Strategy for Curriculum Development: The Constructive Use of Goals and Objectives. Teaching Sociology. 5(1). 65–65. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact