Peter Bishop
Impact in
-
- Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Urban Studies top 2%
- Urban Planning and Governance
Papers in
-
- Complex Systems and Decision Making 6
- Co-authors
- Andy HinesLesley WilliamsGeorge WoodcockDavid Ν. ΒengstonStefan WuertzPeter A. WildererSusan LuckmanJean Duruz
- Journals
- Futures (3 papers)foresight (3 papers)Continuum (2 papers)Journal of futures studies (2 papers)Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Bishop
49 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Management Science and Operations Research 213
- Urban Studies 85
- Management of Technology and Innovation 76
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 123
- Global and Planetary Change 208
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bishop. The network helps show where Peter Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 6 | Reconciliation and Pedagogy. Postcolonial Politics. | 2012 | 1 |
| 7 | 2012 | 48 | |
| 8 | Case Study: Futurizing the K-12 Teaching Practice | 2011 | 3 |
| 9 | Why Teach the Future | 2010 | 6 |
| 10 | Grey walls: advertising the retirement home | 2010 | 1 |
| 11 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 14 | Tranmere Rovers Football Club | 1998 | 1 |
| 15 | 1994 | 54 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 47 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 53 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1977 | 5 |
About Peter Bishop
Peter Bishop is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Geography, Planning and Development, Anthropology and Public Administration, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (6 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (4 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (2 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers) and Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (213 citations), Urban Studies (85 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (76 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (123 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (208 citations). Peter Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andy Hines, Lesley Williams, George Woodcock, David Ν. Βengston, Stefan Wuertz, Peter A. Wilderer, Susan Luckman, Jean Duruz, Derek L. Phillips and Laszlo Radvanyi. Their work appears in journals such as Futures, foresight, Continuum, Journal of futures studies and Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.