Peter A. Koen

1.5k total citations
19 papers, 814 citations indexed

About

Peter A. Koen is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter A. Koen has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 814 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Strategy and Management, 7 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 4 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. Recurrent topics in Peter A. Koen's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (9 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers) and Technology Assessment and Management (4 papers). Peter A. Koen is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (9 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers) and Technology Assessment and Management (4 papers). Peter A. Koen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Peter A. Koen's co-authors include Heidi M. J. Bertels, Ian Elsum, Robin A. Karol, Jeffrey M. Davidson, Aleksandar G. Slavejkov, Albert L. Johnson, Michael J. Incorvia, Klaus W. Wagner, Elko J. Kleinschmidt and Murad A. Mithani and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Product Innovation Management, Research-Technology Management and International Journal of Innovation Management.

In The Last Decade

Peter A. Koen

19 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter A. Koen United States 10 527 247 142 109 108 19 814
Murray R. Millson United States 11 549 1.0× 316 1.3× 194 1.4× 149 1.4× 90 0.8× 33 853
Joseph G. Morone United States 10 534 1.0× 239 1.0× 213 1.5× 127 1.2× 171 1.6× 16 963
Greg Stevens United States 8 276 0.5× 140 0.6× 117 0.8× 53 0.5× 64 0.6× 11 519
John H. Friar United States 15 638 1.2× 416 1.7× 203 1.4× 120 1.1× 77 0.7× 25 1.1k
Jürgen Mihm France 14 346 0.7× 311 1.3× 307 2.2× 55 0.5× 51 0.5× 27 854
Anja Schulze Switzerland 11 558 1.1× 198 0.8× 128 0.9× 32 0.3× 105 1.0× 18 881
Ann Ledwith Ireland 17 543 1.0× 221 0.9× 322 2.3× 55 0.5× 125 1.2× 38 1.1k
Francesco Zirpoli Italy 13 563 1.1× 246 1.0× 97 0.7× 47 0.4× 81 0.8× 58 844
Linda Rochford United States 11 249 0.5× 152 0.6× 106 0.7× 73 0.7× 70 0.6× 18 524
S. G. Green United States 8 561 1.1× 204 0.8× 276 1.9× 51 0.5× 80 0.7× 8 970

Countries citing papers authored by Peter A. Koen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter A. Koen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter A. Koen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter A. Koen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter A. Koen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter A. Koen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter A. Koen. The network helps show where Peter A. Koen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter A. Koen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter A. Koen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter A. Koen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter A. Koen. Peter A. Koen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Koen, Peter A., et al.. (2020). Abet 2000: What Are The Most Important Criteria To The Supervisors Of New Engineering Undergraduates?. 3.64.1–3.64.8. 6 indexed citations
2.
Koen, Peter A.. (2020). Using An Industry Survey To Obtain Faculty Support For Abet 2000 Criteria. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 3.604.1–3.604.7. 3 indexed citations
3.
Bertels, Heidi M. J., et al.. (2019). CORPORATE CHAMPIONS OF EARLY-STAGE PROJECT PROPOSALS AND THE INSTITUTIONALISATION OF ORGANISATIONAL INERTIA. International Journal of Innovation Management. 24(3). 2050028–2050028. 5 indexed citations
4.
Bertels, Heidi M. J., Peter A. Koen, & Ian Elsum. (2015). Business models outside the core. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 21 indexed citations
5.
Koen, Peter A., Heidi M. J. Bertels, & Elko J. Kleinschmidt. (2015). Managing the Front End of Innovation—Part I: Results From a Three-Year Study. Research-Technology Management. 57(2). 34–43. 25 indexed citations
7.
Koen, Peter A., Heidi M. J. Bertels, & Elko J. Kleinschmidt. (2014). Managing the Front End of Innovation-Part II: Results from a Three-Year Study: Effective Front-End Activities Were Found to Be Significantly Different for Incremental and Radical Projects. Research-Technology Management. 57(3). 25. 14 indexed citations
8.
Koen, Peter A., et al.. (2014). Technology Stage-Gate™: A Structured Process for Managing High-Risk New Technology Projects. 9 indexed citations
9.
10.
Koen, Peter A., Heidi M. J. Bertels, & Ian Elsum. (2011). The Three Faces of Business Model Innovation: Challenges for Established Firms. Research-Technology Management. 54(3). 52–59. 78 indexed citations
11.
Bertels, Heidi M. J., Elko J. Kleinschmidt, & Peter A. Koen. (2011). Communities of Practice versus Organizational Climate: Which One Matters More to Dispersed Collaboration in the Front End of Innovation?*. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 28(5). 757–772. 64 indexed citations
12.
Koen, Peter A., Heidi M. J. Bertels, & Ian Elsum. (2011). THE THREE FACES OF BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION: CHALLENGES FOR ESTABLISHED FIRMS. Research-Technology Management. 54(3). 52–59. 11 indexed citations
13.
Koen, Peter A., et al.. (2010). Breakthrough Innovation Dilemmas: Although Large, Incumbent Firms Have Demonstrated an Ability to Succeed at Breakthrough Technology Innovation, They Too Often Fail at Business-Model Innovation That Requires Them to Move into New Market Spaces. This Group Is Working to Identify the Factors That Make Business-Model Innovation So Difficult for Large Companies. Research-Technology Management. 53(6). 48. 8 indexed citations
14.
Bertels, Heidi M. J., Peter A. Koen, & Elko J. Kleinschmidt. (2009). Lessons from 238 Companies: Senior Management, Exploitation, Exploration, and Corporate Entrepreneurship Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
15.
Koen, Peter A., Jeffrey M. Davidson, Michael J. Incorvia, et al.. (2001). PROVIDING CLARITY AND A COMMON LANGUAGE TO THE "FUZZY FRONT END" Eight companies collectively determined a theoretical construct for the Fuzzy Front End of innovation in order to provide a common framework and language; they found that highly innovative companies have a more proficient FFE.. 1 indexed citations
16.
Koen, Peter A., Jeffrey M. Davidson, Michael J. Incorvia, et al.. (2001). Providing Clarity and A Common Language to the “Fuzzy Front End”. Research-Technology Management. 44(2). 46–55. 496 indexed citations
17.
Koen, Peter A.. (2000). Developing Corporate Intrapreneurs. Engineering Management Journal. 12(2). 3–7. 9 indexed citations
18.
Koen, Peter A., et al.. (1998). Idea Generation: Who Has The Most Profitable Ideas. Engineering Management Journal. 10(4). 35–40. 27 indexed citations
19.
Koen, Peter A.. (1997). Technology Maps: Choosing the Right Path. Engineering Management Journal. 9(4). 7–11. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026