Ian Elsum

12 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Ian Elsum
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Strategy and Management 121
  • Business and International Management 11
  • Marketing 50
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 36
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 107
Replace Ji-Feng Yang with:
Ji-Feng Yang China
Yi Fan United States
Greg Young United States
Eric H. Neilsen United States
Levente Szász Romania
François Moreau France
C. T. Yap Singapore
Gabriele Colombo Italy
Ian Robson United Kingdom
Ian Elsum relative to Ji-Feng Yang China Ji-Feng Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ji-Feng Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Elsum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Elsum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Elsum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Elsum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Elsum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Elsum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Elsum. The network helps show where Ian Elsum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Ian Elsum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Elsum Line = papers co-authored together Ian Elsum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201178
2 201851
3 198249
4 198245
5 197628
6 201522
7 201111
8
Breakthrough Innovation Dilemmas: Although Large, Incumbent Firms Have Demonstrated an Ability to Succeed at Breakthrough Technology Innovation, They Too Often Fail at Business-Model Innovation That Requires Them to Move into New Market Spaces. This Group Is Working to Identify the Factors That Make Business-Model Innovation So Difficult for Large Companies
20108
9 20237
10 19825
11 20113
12 20252

About Ian Elsum

Ian Elsum is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Spectroscopy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (1 paper), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper), Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (1 paper) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (121 citations), Business and International Management (11 citations), Marketing (50 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (36 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (107 citations). Ian Elsum has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roy G. Gordon, Heidi M. J. Bertels, Peter A. Koen, Andrew Terhorst, Peng Wang, Dean Lusher, Ronald D. Brown, Frank R. Burden, G. L. Blackman and D. P. Craig. Their work appears in journals such as Research-Technology Management, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, Project Management Journal and Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact