Peta Stapleton

99 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peta Stapleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Research and Theory 70
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 288
  • Clinical Psychology 545
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 303
  • Applied Psychology 96
Replace Linda Cooper with:
Linda Cooper United States
Victor S. Sierpina United States
Fredrik Svenaeus Sweden
Sarah Fogarty Australia
Christopher K. Germer United States
Kathleen A. Lawler United States
Elizabeth Pommier United States
Federica Sancassiani Italy
Carmela Mento Italy
Sau Fong Leung Hong Kong
Peta Stapleton relative to Linda Cooper United States Linda Cooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Linda Cooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peta Stapleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peta Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peta Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peta Stapleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peta Stapleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peta Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peta Stapleton. The network helps show where Peta Stapleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peta Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peta Stapleton Line = papers co-authored together Peta Stapleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014114
2 2017110
3 200975
4 201958
5 202050
6 201135
7 201834
8 202233
9 200730
10 201429
11 201429
12 202027
13 201626
14 201825
15
The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Emotional Freedom Techniques in Reducing Depression and Anxiety Among Adults: A Pilot Study.
201625
16 201524
17 201223
18 201723
19 201421
20 201321

About Peta Stapleton

Peta Stapleton is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Research and Theory, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 104 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (32 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (29 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (24 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (21 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (15 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (10 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (10 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (70 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (288 citations), Clinical Psychology (545 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (303 citations) and Applied Psychology (96 citations). Peta Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Hannah Chatwin, Dawson Church, Aileen M. Pidgeon, Barbara C. Y. Lo, Amanda Henderson, Debra Creedy, Rebecca Sims, Emma Eaton, Belinda Lloyd and Brett Carter. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Australian Psychologist, Eating Disorders, Professional Psychology Research and Practice and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026