Sarah Fogarty
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- John D. TeasdaleRobert Joseph TaylorPhillipa HayLucie M. RamjanAnthony S. DavidJames WilliamsCaroline SmithRakime Elmir
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (13 papers)Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (9 papers)Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Abnormal PsychologyThe British Journal of PsychiatryBehaviour Research and Therapy
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sarah Fogarty
42 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Clinical Psychology 459
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 398
- Cognitive Neuroscience 391
- Social Psychology 265
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 176
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Fogarty
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Fogarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Fogarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Fogarty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Fogarty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Fogarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Fogarty. The network helps show where Sarah Fogarty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Fogarty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Fogarty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Fogarty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Fogarty. Sarah Fogarty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Sarah Fogarty
Sarah Fogarty is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Research and Theory and Occupational Therapy, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (13 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (9 papers) and Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (398 citations), Applied Psychology (120 citations) and Clinical Psychology (459 citations). Sarah Fogarty has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John D. Teasdale, Robert Joseph Taylor, Phillipa Hay, Lucie M. Ramjan, Anthony S. David, James Williams, Caroline Smith, Rakime Elmir, Virginia Schmied and Stephen Touyz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.