Hartry Field
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.05%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 32
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 15
- Co-authors
- David B. Malament (1 shared paper)Michael Lockwood (1 shared paper)Harvey Lederman (1 shared paper)Robert Ackermann (1 shared paper)Anthony Quinton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Review of Symbolic Logic (7 papers)The Journal of Philosophy (7 papers)Philosophical Studies (5 papers)The Philosophical Review (5 papers)Noûs (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayIreland
In The Last Decade
Hartry Field
63 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- History and Philosophy of Science 1.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.9k
- Philosophy 1.4k
- Theoretical Computer Science 134
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 407
Countries citing papers authored by Hartry Field
This map shows the geographic impact of Hartry Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hartry Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hartry Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hartry Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hartry Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hartry Field. The network helps show where Hartry Field may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Hartry Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 435 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 224 | |
| 3 | 1978 | 197 | |
| 4 | 1972 | 194 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 182 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 174 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 128 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 87 | |
| 9 | 1978 | 81 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 79 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 75 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 75 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 68 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 51 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 50 | |
| 16 | 1974 | 45 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 45 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 44 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 43 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 41 |
About Hartry Field
Hartry Field is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (32 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (15 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (8 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (1.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.9k citations), Philosophy (1.4k citations), Theoretical Computer Science (134 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (407 citations). Hartry Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include David B. Malament, Michael Lockwood, Harvey Lederman, Robert Ackermann and Anthony Quinton. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of Symbolic Logic, The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Studies, The Philosophical Review and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.