Peida Zhan

44 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Peida Zhan
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Management Science and Operations Research 184
  • Computer Science Applications 58
  • Statistics and Probability 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 83
Replace Laine Bradshaw with:
Laine Bradshaw United States
Maria Bolsinova Netherlands
Peter W. van Rijn United States
André A. Rupp United States
Duanli Yan United States
Paul D. Nichols United States
David J. Scrams United States
Louis V. DiBello United States
Cynthia G. Parshall United States
Deborah J. Harris United States
Peida Zhan relative to Laine Bradshaw United States Laine Bradshaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Laine Bradshaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peida Zhan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peida Zhan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peida Zhan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peida Zhan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peida Zhan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peida Zhan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peida Zhan. The network helps show where Peida Zhan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peida Zhan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peida Zhan Line = papers co-authored together Peida Zhan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20241
3 20231
4 20235
5 20233
6 20235
7 20231
8 20231
9 20232
10 20233
11 20232
12 202220
13 20215
14 20209
15 202017
16 202025
17 201818
18 20173
19 20151
20 20141

About Peida Zhan

Peida Zhan is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications, having authored 46 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (17 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (9 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (9 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (8 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (8 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (4 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (184 citations), Computer Science Applications (58 citations), Statistics and Probability (86 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 citations). Peida Zhan has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Hong Jiao, Yufang Bian, Fang Tang, Wen‐Chung Wang, Feiming Li, Jeffrey R. Harring, Lijun Wang, Xiaomin Li, Qipeng Chen and Stefanie A. Wind. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Applied Psychological Measurement, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Journal of Intelligence and Behavior Research Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026