Amber S. Messersmith

518 total citations
10 papers, 359 citations indexed

About

Amber S. Messersmith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber S. Messersmith has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Amber S. Messersmith's work include Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers). Amber S. Messersmith is often cited by papers focused on Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers). Amber S. Messersmith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Russia. Amber S. Messersmith's co-authors include Paul Schrodt, Paul L. Witt, Ryan S. Bisel, K. M. Kelley, Joann Keyton, Stephenson J. Beck and Adrianne Kunkel and has published in prestigious journals such as Communication Monographs, Journal of Applied Communication Research and Organizational Behavior Teaching Review.

In The Last Decade

Amber S. Messersmith

10 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amber S. Messersmith United States	6	184	140	107	62	47	10	359
Sally O. Hastings United States	12	118 0.6×	144 1.0×	92 0.9×	30 0.5×	27 0.6×	32	338
Lisa K. Hanasono United States	9	220 1.2×	135 1.0×	100 0.9×	34 0.5×	56 1.2×	24	400
Katheryn C. Maguire United States	11	237 1.3×	219 1.6×	138 1.3×	131 2.1×	30 0.6×	25	515
Brooks Aylor United States	8	353 1.9×	180 1.3×	72 0.7×	49 0.8×	67 1.4×	9	455
Young-ok Yum United States	10	206 1.1×	205 1.5×	55 0.5×	37 0.6×	15 0.3×	13	384
Glen H. Stamp United States	13	197 1.1×	167 1.2×	83 0.8×	30 0.5×	37 0.8×	20	437
Gina Castle Bell United States	10	119 0.6×	135 1.0×	56 0.5×	18 0.3×	47 1.0×	15	306
Diana I. Ríos United States	9	144 0.8×	204 1.5×	72 0.7×	16 0.3×	64 1.4×	12	374
Cem Şafak Çukur United States	8	182 1.0×	208 1.5×	55 0.5×	47 0.8×	38 0.8×	11	358
Anthony G. Munton United Kingdom	11	99 0.5×	122 0.9×	136 1.3×	82 1.3×	118 2.5×	23	446

Countries citing papers authored by Amber S. Messersmith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber S. Messersmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber S. Messersmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber S. Messersmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber S. Messersmith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber S. Messersmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber S. Messersmith. The network helps show where Amber S. Messersmith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber S. Messersmith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber S. Messersmith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber S. Messersmith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber S. Messersmith. Amber S. Messersmith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Messersmith, Amber S., et al.. (2015). Newlywed Reports of Social Support During Engagement: What Worked and What Failed. Communication Studies. 66(3). 257–276. 3 indexed citations

Messersmith, Amber S.. (2015). Preparing Students for 21st Century Teamwork: Effective Collaboration in the Online Group Communication Course. Communication Teacher. 29(4). 219–226. 10 indexed citations

Messersmith, Amber S., et al.. (2014). The Influence of Family Communication Patterns on Religious Orientation Among College Students. Journal of Family Communication. 14(1). 72–84. 13 indexed citations

Bisel, Ryan S., Amber S. Messersmith, & K. M. Kelley. (2012). Supervisor-Subordinate Communication: Hierarchical Mum Effect Meets Organizational Learning. Journal of Business Communication. 49(2). 128–147. 59 indexed citations

Bisel, Ryan S. & Amber S. Messersmith. (2012). Organizational and Supervisory Apology Effectiveness. Business Communication Quarterly. 75(4). 425–448. 25 indexed citations

Keyton, Joann, Stephenson J. Beck, Amber S. Messersmith, & Ryan S. Bisel. (2010). Ensuring Communication Research Makes a Difference. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 38(3). 306–309. 5 indexed citations

Bisel, Ryan S., Amber S. Messersmith, & Joann Keyton. (2009). Understanding Organizational Culture and Communication through a Gyroscope Metaphor. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 34(3). 342–366. 14 indexed citations

Messersmith, Amber S., Joann Keyton, & Ryan S. Bisel. (2009). Teaching Organizational Culture. Communication Teacher. 23(2). 81–86. 1 indexed citations

Messersmith, Amber S., Joann Keyton, & Ryan S. Bisel. (2009). Training Practice as Communication Medium: A Throughput Model. 2 indexed citations

10.

Schrodt, Paul, Paul L. Witt, & Amber S. Messersmith. (2008). A Meta-Analytical Review of Family Communication Patterns and their Associations with Information Processing, Behavioral, and Psychosocial Outcomes. Communication Monographs. 75(3). 248–269. 227 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact