Paul Salzman
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- History top 5%
- Anthropology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Museology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ken GelderKatherine Duncan‐JönesJohn MorrillElaine HobbyDavid LoewensteinNigel SmithSharon AchinsteinAnnabel Patterson
- Topics
- Australian History and Society (3 papers)Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Paul Salzman
12 papers receiving 47 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Literature and Literary Theory 39
- History 32
- Anthropology 21
- Sociology and Political Science 18
- Museology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Salzman
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Salzman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Salzman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Salzman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Salzman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Salzman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Salzman. The network helps show where Paul Salzman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Salzman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Salzman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Salzman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Salzman. Paul Salzman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Literature and Politics in the 1620s: 'Whisper'd Counsells' | 1 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Expanding the Canon of Early Modern Women's Writing | 4 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | After the Celebration: Australian Fiction 1989-2007 | 19 |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | Early Modern Women's Writing: An Anthology 1560-1700 | 3 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | An anthology of seventeenth-century fiction | 5 |
| 17 | Talking/listening: Anecdotal style in recent Australian women's fiction | 1 |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Paul Salzman
Paul Salzman is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and History, having authored 20 papers that have together received 81 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations), History (32 citations) and Museology (9 citations). Paul Salzman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ken Gelder, Katherine Duncan‐Jönes, John Morrill, Elaine Hobby, David Loewenstein, Nigel Smith, Sharon Achinstein, Annabel Patterson, Dale Spender and Thomas N. Corns. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature and The Review of English Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.