Philip Connell

441 citations
14 papers · 104 · h-index 5

Impact in

  • History top 5%
    • Scottish History and National Identity
    • Travel Writing and Literature
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis

Papers in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 4
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 1
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
    • Travel Writing and Literature 1

Philip Connell

11 papers receiving 61 citations

Peers

Philip Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • History 39
  • Literature and Literary Theory 37
  • Museology 11
  • Library and Information Sciences 4
  • Classics 7
Replace Paul Salzman with:
Paul Salzman Australia
Laurie Shannon United States
Stephen Colclough United Kingdom
Jan Fergus United States
Susan Wiseman United Kingdom
Gillian Russell United Kingdom
Thomas Keymer United Kingdom
Brian Maidment United Kingdom
Sonia Massai United Kingdom
Timothy Raylor United States
Philip Connell relative to Paul Salzman Australia Paul Salzman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Paul Salzman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Connell. The network helps show where Philip Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Philip Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Connell Line = papers co-authored together Philip Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200543
2 200616
3 200015
4 20007
5 20056
6
Romanticism and Popular Culture in Britain and Ireland
20094
7 20094
8
Secular Chains: Poetry and the Politics of Religion from Milton to Pope
20163
9 20163
10 20111
11 20111
12 20001
13 20200
14 20180

About Philip Connell

Philip Connell is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Political Science and International Relations, Classics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 104 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Travel Writing and Literature (1 paper) and Irish and British Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (39 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (37 citations), Museology (11 citations), Library and Information Sciences (4 citations) and Classics (7 citations). Frequent co-authors include Nigel Leask. Their work appears in journals such as Representations, Notes and Queries, Eighteenth-Century Studies, The Review of English Studies and The Historical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact