David Norbrook
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Lucy Hutchinson (2 shared papers)Elizabeth M. Sauer (1 shared paper)David M. Bevington (1 shared paper)H. R. Woudhuysen (1 shared paper)John K. Hale (1 shared paper)Nigel Smith (1 shared paper)Titus Lucretius Carus (1 shared paper)Devoney Kay Looser (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Notes and Queries (5 papers)The Seventeenth Century (4 papers)The Modern Language Review (3 papers)English Literary Renaissance (2 papers)Australian Journal of French Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Norbrook
31 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Classics 189
- History 53
- Literature and Literary Theory 37
- Religious studies 15
- General Arts and Humanities 1
Countries citing papers authored by David Norbrook
This map shows the geographic impact of David Norbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Norbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Norbrook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Norbrook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Norbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Norbrook. The network helps show where David Norbrook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside David Norbrook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 72 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 64 | |
| 4 | Order and Disorder | 2001 | 63 |
| 5 | The Penguin Book of Renaissance Verse: 1509-1659 | 1992 | 36 |
| 6 | 1996 | 32 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 23 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1986 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 19 | The translation of Lucretius | 2012 | 5 |
| 20 | 2003 | 4 |
About David Norbrook
David Norbrook is a scholar working on Classics, History, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and Philosophy, having authored 40 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance Literature and Culture (16 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (1 paper), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (189 citations), History (53 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (37 citations), Religious studies (15 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (1 citation). David Norbrook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Hutchinson, Elizabeth M. Sauer, David M. Bevington, H. R. Woudhuysen, John K. Hale, Nigel Smith, Titus Lucretius Carus, Devoney Kay Looser, Elizabeth R. Clarke and Jane Stevenson. Their work appears in journals such as Notes and Queries, The Seventeenth Century, The Modern Language Review, English Literary Renaissance and Australian Journal of French Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.