Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature

807 papers and 7.2k indexed citations

About

The 807 papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (321 papers), History (167 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (150 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (87 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (60 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature are Elisabeth Bronfen, Roberta Davidson, Joseph A. Kestner, Judith Halberstam, Rita Felski, Jane Tompkins, Mary Ann Doane, Jennifer L. Fleissner, Lillian S. Robinson and Ann Ardis.

In The Last Decade

Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature

378 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026