Paul Monod
- History top 1%
- Scottish History and National Identity 10
- Historical Studies of British Isles 4
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
- Museology top 2%
- Historical Art and Culture Studies 4
- Anthropology top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 7
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 5
-
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 3
-
- Irish and British Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Reed BrowningHannah BarkerTeófilo F. RuizJeremy BlackJesús Izquierdo MartínMurray PittockPeter N. MillerJ. C. D. Clark
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (6 papers)History of European Ideas (3 papers)Eighteenth-Century Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Paul Monod
28 papers receiving 133 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- History 123
- Museology 36
- History and Philosophy of Science 19
- Anthropology 35
- Literature and Literary Theory 31
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Monod
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Monod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Monod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Monod more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Monod
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Monod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Monod. The network helps show where Paul Monod may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Paul Monod, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 5 | Loyalty and Identity.: Jacobites at Home and Abroad | 2010 | 4 |
| 6 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 24 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 14 | Estado, nación y monarquía en el siglo XVIII: visión comparativa | 1996 | 4 |
| 15 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 66 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 14 |
About Paul Monod
Paul Monod is a scholar working on History, Museology, Political Science and International Relations, Music and Philosophy, having authored 31 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (10 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (7 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers) and Irish and British Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (123 citations), Museology (36 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (19 citations), Anthropology (35 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (31 citations). Paul Monod has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Reed Browning, Hannah Barker, Teófilo F. Ruiz, Jeremy Black, Jesús Izquierdo Martín, Murray Pittock, Peter N. Miller and J. C. D. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, History of European Ideas, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Journal of British Studies and The English Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.