International Journal for Equity in Health
About
In The Last Decade
International Journal for Equity in Health
2.5k papers receiving 61.3k citations
Fields of papers published in International Journal for Equity in Health
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal for Equity in Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal for Equity in Health.
Countries where authors publish in International Journal for Equity in Health
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal for Equity in Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal for Equity in Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal for Equity in Health more than expected).
- Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations (2013)
- Waiting times for elective treatments according to insurance status: A randomized empirical study in Germany (2008)
- The challenges facing indigenous communities in Latin America as they confront the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)
- Access to health care for Roma children in Central and Eastern Europe: findings from a qualitative study in Bulgaria (2009)
- Disability inclusiveness of government responses to COVID-19 in South America: a framework analysis study (2020)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.