Pamela Pearson

13 papers receiving 161 citations

Peers

Pamela Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Language and Linguistics 68
  • Research and Theory 4
  • Literature and Literary Theory 52
  • Linguistics and Language 19
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
Replace Jonathan Webster with:
Jonathan Webster United Kingdom
Ismaeil Fazel Canada
Jessica Singer Early United States
María Cioè‐Peña United States
Kathrin Kaufhold Sweden
Cynthia B. Roy United States
George Major New Zealand
Kathy Roskos United States
Antonella Valeo Canada
David Olsher United States
Pamela Pearson relative to Jonathan Webster United Kingdom Jonathan Webster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Jonathan Webster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pamela Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela Pearson. The network helps show where Pamela Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Pamela Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pamela Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Pamela Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201557
2 202230
3 201330
4 201317
5 201611
6 20217
7
Defining the primary health care team.
19925
8 20194
9
KB-PROLOG, a PROLOG for very large knowledge bases
19903
10
Are nurse practitioners merely substitute doctors?
19963
11 20192
12 20232
13 20221
14 20250

About Pamela Pearson

Pamela Pearson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Occupational Therapy, Sociology and Political Science, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Linguistics and Language, having authored 14 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (2 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (2 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Nursing education and management (1 paper) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (68 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (52 citations), Linguistics and Language (19 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (51 citations). Pamela Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Payant, YouJin Kim, Lucy Pickering, Natasha Crooks, Eric Friginal, Kylea L. Liese, Julienne N. Rutherford, Lisa Tussing‐Humphreys, Mary Dawn Koenig and Manuel Dahmen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, Clinical journal of oncology nursing, Studies in Second Language Acquisition and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact