Citations per year, relative to P. J. Walklate P. J. Walklate (= 1×)
peers
Masoud Salyani
Countries citing papers authored by P. J. Walklate
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of P. J. Walklate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. J. Walklate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. J. Walklate more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. J. Walklate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. J. Walklate. The network helps show where P. J. Walklate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. J. Walklate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. J. Walklate.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. J. Walklate based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. J. Walklate. P. J. Walklate is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zande, J.C. van de, M. C. B. Ellis, M. Wenneker, P. J. Walklate, & Marc C. Kennedy. (2014). Spray drift and bystander risk from fruit crop spraying. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 122(122). 177–186.19 indexed citations
2.
Walklate, P. J., J. V. Cross, P. Balsari, et al.. (2010). A webpage calculator for dose rate adjustment of orchard spraying products.. Aspects of applied biology. 359–366.6 indexed citations
3.
Richardson, G. Mark, P. J. Walklate, & D. E. Baker. (2004). Spray drift from apple orchards with deciduous windbreaks. Aspects of applied biology. 711. 149–156.8 indexed citations
4.
Parker, Chris, J. V. Cross, A. J. Gilbert, et al.. (2002). The use of herbicide application equipment for controlling weed growth on hard surfaces in amenity areas.. Aspects of applied biology. 359–366.2 indexed citations
5.
Cross, J. V., A. J. Gilbert, C. R. Glass, et al.. (2000). Low-drift nozzle efficacy with respect to herbicide mode of action.. Aspects of applied biology. 29–34.13 indexed citations
6.
Ellis, M. C. B., C. R. Tuck, J. V. Cross, et al.. (2000). The variation in characteristics of air-included sprays with adjuvants.. Aspects of applied biology. 155–162.11 indexed citations
7.
Parkin, C.S., J. V. Cross, A. J. Gilbert, et al.. (2000). Measurements and computational fluid dynamic simulations of the capture of drops by spray drift samplers.. Aspects of applied biology. 113–120.5 indexed citations
8.
Austerweil, Miriam, Abraham Gamliel, Barbara Steiner, et al.. (2000). Approaches to evaluating the performance of air-assisted pesticide application equipment in greenhouses.. Aspects of applied biology. 391–398.3 indexed citations
9.
Mathers, J. J., C. R. Glass, J. V. Cross, et al.. (2000). Comparison of ground deposit collection media in field drift studies.. Aspects of applied biology. 131–139.5 indexed citations
10.
Lund, Ivar, J. V. Cross, A. J. Gilbert, et al.. (2000). Nozzles for drift reduction.. Aspects of applied biology. 97–102.13 indexed citations
11.
Heijne, B., J. V. Cross, A. J. Gilbert, et al.. (2000). Fruit tree spraying with coarse droplets and adjuvants.. Aspects of applied biology. 279–284.1 indexed citations
12.
Furness, G., P. A. Magarey, J. V. Cross, et al.. (2000). Unit canopy row calibration and a new pesticide label format to improve dose consistency on different canopy sizes with spray application to fruit trees and vines in Australia.. Aspects of applied biology. 309–312.2 indexed citations
13.
Cross, J. V., A. J. Gilbert, C. R. Glass, et al.. (2000). Drift, drift reducing sprayers and sprayer testing.. Aspects of applied biology. 1–10.36 indexed citations
14.
Moor, A. De, Peter Jaeken, Peter Lootens, et al.. (2000). Image analysis of water sensitive paper as a tool for the evaluation of spray distribution of orchard sprayers.. Aspects of applied biology. 329–341.27 indexed citations
15.
Cross, J. V., A. J. Gilbert, C. R. Glass, et al.. (2000). Drift reduction in the vineyards of New York and Pennsylvania.. Aspects of applied biology. 67–73.6 indexed citations
16.
Moor, A. De, W. A. Taylor, J. V. Cross, et al.. (2000). The effect of orifice wear on flat fan nozzle performance: using predictive and dynamic techniques to determine quality of liquid distribution.. Aspects of applied biology. 207–217.1 indexed citations
17.
Cross, J. V., A. J. Gilbert, C. R. Glass, et al.. (2000). Spray application research in field crops in France evaluation of new nozzle type.. Aspects of applied biology. 251–255.2 indexed citations
18.
Robinson, T. H., J. V. Cross, A. J. Gilbert, et al.. (2000). The effect of nozzle angle and nozzle types on the deposition and biological performance of potato blight fungicides.. Aspects of applied biology. 267–272.5 indexed citations
19.
Gamliel, Abraham, Miriam Austerweil, J. V. Cross, et al.. (2000). Improved application to reduce pesticide residues in herb crops.. Aspects of applied biology. 273–278.2 indexed citations
20.
Robinson, T. H., J. V. Cross, A. J. Gilbert, et al.. (2000). The effects of forward speed, spray quality and nozzle types on the deposition and biological performance of strobilurin fungicide.. Aspects of applied biology. 235–242.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.