D. Stock
About
In The Last Decade
D. Stock
61 papers receiving 614 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 384
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 182
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 151
- Plant Science 123
- Automotive Engineering 74
Countries citing papers authored by D. Stock
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Stock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Stock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Stock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Stock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Stock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Stock. The network helps show where D. Stock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Stock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Stock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Stock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Stock. D. Stock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | How best to spray cocoa with motorised mistblowers | 2 |
| 5 | Improved sprayer performance in trailed pepper crops in the greenhouse. | 2 |
| 6 | A webpage calculator for dose rate adjustment of orchard spraying products. | 6 |
| 7 | Risk estimation of bystander and residential exposure from orchard spraying based on measured spray drift data. | 2 |
| 8 | Generation of field data for bystander exposure and spray drift with arable sprayers. | 7 |
| 9 | Effect of sprayer speed and nozzle type on spray distribution and biological efficacy in potato late blight control. | 1 |
| 10 | Improved control of annual grass weeds with foliar acting herbicides using angled applications. | 3 |
| 11 | Biomass and energy crops III (Aspects of Applied Biology 90) | 1 |
| 12 | Triticale as a low input cereal for alcohol production. I. Alcohol yields and processing quality of triticale varieties grown under UK conditions. | 3 |
| 13 | Developing wheat for the biofuels market. | 6 |
| 14 | Microwave processing as a green and energy efficient technology for the production of energy and chemicals from biomass and energy crops. | 2 |
| 15 | Triticale as a low input cereal for alcohol production. II. Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions relative to bioethanol from wheat. | 4 |
| 16 | Towards defining optimal feedstocks for a wheat biorefinery: co-production of arabinoxylans with bioethanol. | 3 |
| 17 | Growth and water use of Salix viminalis, Populus trichocarpa and Eucalyptus gunnii field trial plantation irrigated with secondary treated effluent. | 4 |
| 18 | The use of short rotation coppice poplar and willow for the bioremediation of sewage effluent. | 14 |
| 19 | Growing SRC willow in genotype mixtures. | 2 |
| 20 | The use of herbicide application equipment for controlling weed growth on hard surfaces in amenity areas. | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.