C. R. Tuck

834 total citations
25 papers, 623 citations indexed

About

C. R. Tuck is a scholar working on Plant Science, Computational Mechanics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, C. R. Tuck has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 623 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Plant Science, 11 papers in Computational Mechanics and 11 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in C. R. Tuck's work include Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (20 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (9 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (7 papers). C. R. Tuck is often cited by papers focused on Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (20 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (9 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (7 papers). C. R. Tuck collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. C. R. Tuck's co-authors include M. C. B. Ellis, P. C. H. Miller, N. M. Western, P. J. Walklate, P.A. Hobson, Peter J. Holloway, Ann L. Hayes, A. M. Bradley, M.J. O’Dogherty and David E. Baker and has published in prestigious journals such as Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Crop Protection and Biosystems Engineering.

In The Last Decade

C. R. Tuck

22 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. R. Tuck United Kingdom 12 511 213 207 59 51 25 623
D. L. Reichard United States 15 528 1.0× 141 0.7× 132 0.6× 37 0.6× 43 0.8× 52 653
R. D. Brazee United States 18 775 1.5× 130 0.6× 175 0.8× 73 1.2× 46 0.9× 65 939
M. C. B. Ellis United Kingdom 19 899 1.8× 285 1.3× 291 1.4× 96 1.6× 109 2.1× 50 1.1k
Donald Dekeyser Belgium 13 679 1.3× 163 0.8× 171 0.8× 63 1.1× 42 0.8× 42 751
H.J. Holterman Netherlands 11 370 0.7× 89 0.4× 92 0.4× 48 0.8× 77 1.5× 52 599
N. M. Western United Kingdom 17 636 1.2× 93 0.4× 101 0.5× 33 0.6× 78 1.5× 56 746
Mieke De Schampheleire Belgium 16 1.1k 2.2× 268 1.3× 300 1.4× 123 2.1× 130 2.5× 28 1.3k
Mathieu Massinon Belgium 12 377 0.7× 230 1.1× 137 0.7× 12 0.2× 53 1.0× 28 539
Steven A. Cryer United States 15 280 0.5× 215 1.0× 108 0.5× 33 0.6× 112 2.2× 43 680
W. E. Bagley United States 10 284 0.6× 60 0.3× 76 0.4× 19 0.3× 48 0.9× 12 345

Countries citing papers authored by C. R. Tuck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. R. Tuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. R. Tuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. R. Tuck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. R. Tuck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. R. Tuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. R. Tuck. The network helps show where C. R. Tuck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. R. Tuck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. R. Tuck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. R. Tuck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. R. Tuck. C. R. Tuck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ellis, M. C. B., et al.. (2016). Spray drift: An investigation of the relationship between field, wind tunnel measurements and model predictions for determining drift reduction.. Aspects of applied biology. 132(132). 207–216. 1 indexed citations
2.
Miller, Paul, et al.. (2011). Methods for minimising drift and off-target exposure from boom sprayer applications.. Aspects of applied biology. 281–288. 10 indexed citations
3.
Miller, P. C. H., et al.. (2011). The development and evaluation of nozzle systems for use in targeted spot spraying applications.. Aspects of applied biology. 159–166. 2 indexed citations
4.
Tuck, C. R., M. C. B. Ellis, Paul Miller, et al.. (2010). An alternative surfactant to nonyl phenol ethoxylates for spray application research.. Aspects of applied biology. 311–316. 1 indexed citations
5.
Miller, Paul, C. R. Tuck, P. Balsari, et al.. (2010). Comparison of sampling arrangements to determine airborne spray profiles in wind tunnel conditions.. Aspects of applied biology. 291–296. 4 indexed citations
6.
Miller, P. C. H., M. C. B. Ellis, Roy Bateman, et al.. (2010). Deposit distributions on targets with different geometries and treated with a range of spray characteristics.. Aspects of applied biology. 241–248. 2 indexed citations
7.
Miller, Paul, C. R. Tuck, P. Balsari, et al.. (2010). Measurements of the droplet size and velocity distributions in the sprays produced by a range of pressure nozzle designs operating with a range of spray liquids.. Aspects of applied biology. 219–224. 2 indexed citations
8.
Miller, Paul, C. R. Tuck, M. C. B. Ellis, et al.. (2008). Factors influencing the risk of spray drift from nozzles operating on a boom sprayer.. 9–16. 5 indexed citations
9.
10.
Tuck, C. R., et al.. (2005). Factors Influencing the Performance of Spray Delivery Systems: A Review of Recent Developments. Journal of ASTM International. 2(6). 1–13. 26 indexed citations
11.
Ellis, M. C. B., C. R. Tuck, & P. C. H. Miller. (2001). How surface tension of surfactant solutions influences the characteristics of sprays produced by hydraulic nozzles used for pesticide application. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 180(3). 267–276. 81 indexed citations
12.
Ellis, M. C. B., A. M. Bradley, & C. R. Tuck. (2001). The characteristics of sprays produced by air induction nozzles.. 665–670. 1 indexed citations
13.
Ellis, M. C. B., C. R. Tuck, J. V. Cross, et al.. (2000). The variation in characteristics of air-included sprays with adjuvants.. Aspects of applied biology. 155–162. 11 indexed citations
14.
Ellis, M. C. B. & C. R. Tuck. (1999). How adjuvants influence spray formation with different hydraulic nozzles. Crop Protection. 18(2). 101–109. 64 indexed citations
15.
Tuck, C. R., M. C. B. Ellis, & P. C. H. Miller. (1997). Techniques for measurement of droplet size and velocity distributions in agricultural sprays. Crop Protection. 16(7). 619–628. 66 indexed citations
16.
Ellis, M. C. B., C. R. Tuck, & P. C. H. Miller. (1997). The effect of some adjuvants on sprays produced by agricultural flat fan nozzles. Crop Protection. 16(1). 41–50. 80 indexed citations
17.
Miller, P. C. H., M. C. B. Ellis, & C. R. Tuck. (1996). ENTRAINED AIR AND DROPLET VELOCITIES PRODUCED BY AGRICULTURAL FLAT-FAN NOZZLES. Atomization and Sprays. 6(6). 693–707. 15 indexed citations
18.
Hobson, P.A., P. C. H. Miller, P. J. Walklate, C. R. Tuck, & N. M. Western. (1993). Spray Drift from Hydraulic Spray Nozzles: the Use of a Computer Simulation Model to Examine Factors Influencing Drift. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 54(4). 293–305. 58 indexed citations
19.
Tuck, C. R., et al.. (1991). Field experiments to study the performance of toothed disc mowing mechanisms. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 50. 93–106. 8 indexed citations
20.
Tuck, C. R., et al.. (1980). Economic and practical aspects of high-capacity rotary mower and mower-conditioner systems.. 35(1). 11–14. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. L. Reichard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. D. Brazee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. C. B. Ellis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Donald Dekeyser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H.J. Holterman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. M. Western Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mieke De Schampheleire Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mathieu Massinon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Steven A. Cryer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W. E. Bagley
Rankless by CCL
2026