Owsei Temkin

2.2k citations
39 papers · 584 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Owsei Temkin

31 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Owsei Temkin
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • History 206
  • History and Philosophy of Science 82
  • Philosophy 102
  • General Psychology 10
  • Anatomy 10
Replace Roger French with:
Roger French United Kingdom
Nancy G. Siraisi United States
David Sider United States
L. S. Jacyna United Kingdom
Mark S. Micale United States
Hans Pols Australia
Rob Boddice Germany
Ian Dowbiggin Canada
Jonathan Sadowsky United States
Felicitas D. Goodman United States
Owsei Temkin relative to Roger French United Kingdom Roger French's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Roger French · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Owsei Temkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Owsei Temkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Owsei Temkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Owsei Temkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Owsei Temkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Owsei Temkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Owsei Temkin. The network helps show where Owsei Temkin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Owsei Temkin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Owsei Temkin Line = papers co-authored together Owsei Temkin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974107
2 196892
3 197859
4 199252
5 199534
6 195934
7 196230
8 200626
9
The role of surgery in the rise of modern medical thought.
200420
10
Gall and the phrenological movement.
201018
11
THE CLASSICAL ROOTS OF GLISSON'S DOCTRINE OF IRRITATION.
199617
12
German concepts of ontogeny and history around 1800.
200417
13 197014
14 195114
15 195312
16 19855
17 20014
18
Therapeutic trends and the treatment of syphilis before 1900.
20033
19
Medicine and the problem of moral responsibility.
20073
20 19753

About Owsei Temkin

Owsei Temkin is a scholar working on History, General Health Professions, Archeology, Neurology and Classics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Medicine Studies (10 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Medical History and Innovations (4 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (2 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (206 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (82 citations), Philosophy (102 citations), General Psychology (10 citations) and Anatomy (10 citations). Owsei Temkin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George Rosen, John B. Saunders, Ann Ellis Hanson, Galen, Bentley Glass, William L. Straus, Conway Zirkle, Philip G. Ziegler, Elizabeth Asmis and Judith T. Irvine. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The American Journal of Philology, Evolution, Isis and The Classical World.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact