David Sider

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
46 papers, 564 citations indexed

About

David Sider is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Sider has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 564 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Anthropology, 20 papers in Philosophy and 19 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in David Sider's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (21 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (19 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (14 papers). David Sider is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (21 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (19 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (14 papers). David Sider collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. David Sider's co-authors include Heinrich von Staden, Oliver Taplin, Jan Ν. Bremmer, Beth Savan, Deborah Boedeker, Anne Carson, David Bain, C. C. W. Taylor, Hugh Lloyd-Jones and A.M.J. Derks and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The Classical World and Local Environment.

In The Last Decade

David Sider

35 papers receiving 360 citations

Hit Papers

Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria 1990 2026 2002 2014 1990 50 100 150

Peers

David Sider
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Anthropology 261
  • Archeology 170
  • Philosophy 139
  • History 94
  • Literature and Literary Theory 60
Replace Elizabeth Rawson with:
Elizabeth Rawson Netherlands
Elizabeth Belfiore United States
Maria Wyke United Kingdom
G. M. Kirkwood United Kingdom
Bernard M. W. Knox United States
Friedrich Solmsen United States
Sarah Iles Johnston United States
Jasper Griffin United Kingdom
William W. Fortenbaugh United States
Christopher A. Faraone United States
Elizabeth Rawson Netherlands View profile →
Citations per field, relative to David Sider
David Sider · 1×
Citations per year, relative to David Sider
David Sider · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by David Sider

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Sider's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sider with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sider more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Sider

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sider. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sider. The network helps show where David Sider may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Sider

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Sider. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Sider based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Sider. David Sider is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2
The new Simonides : contexts of praise and desire
26
3 0
4 6
5 1
6 11
7 5
8 0
9 1
10
Plato's Hippias major
1
11
Textual Notes on Parmenides' Poem
2
12 4
13 3
14 0
15 1
16 77
17 23
18 1
19 2
20 0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026