Rob Boddice
Impact in
- General Psychology top 10%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- History top 1%
- History of Emotions Research
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Medical History and Innovations
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology 4
-
- History of Science and Medicine 9
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 5
- Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies 4
- Historical Philosophy and Science 2
Rob Boddice
29 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- General Psychology 17
- History 101
- History and Philosophy of Science 33
- Geography, Planning and Development 26
- Literature and Literary Theory 24
Countries citing papers authored by Rob Boddice
This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Boddice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Boddice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Boddice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Boddice
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Boddice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Boddice. The network helps show where Rob Boddice may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Rob Boddice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 40 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 8 | A History of Attitudes and Behaviours Toward Animals in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-century Britain: Anthropocentrism and the Emergence of Animals | 2009 | 13 |
| 9 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 13 | The Science of Sympathy: Morality, Evolution, and Victorian Civilization | 2016 | 8 |
| 14 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 3 |
About Rob Boddice
Rob Boddice is a scholar working on General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, History, Geography, Planning and Development and Clinical Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Emotions Research (11 papers), History of Science and Medicine (9 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (8 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (4 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (3 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (17 citations), History (101 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (33 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (24 citations). Rob Boddice has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark M. Smith and Peter N. Stearns. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social History, Social History of Medicine, Contemporary British History, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences and Emotion Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.