Rob Boddice

996 citations
45 papers · 448 · 1 hit paper · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Rob Boddice

39 papers receiving 365 citations

Rob Boddice's Hit Papers

Emotion, Sense, Experience 2020 · 73 citations
730+2+4Years since publication204060

Peers

Rob Boddice
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • History 77
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 20
  • History and Philosophy of Science 14
  • Law 20
  • General Psychology 2
Replace R. G. Collingwood with:
R. G. Collingwood
Richard Eldridge United States
Manfred Kuehn United States
Lisa Zunshine United States
William H. Blake
Samuel Beckett Finland
Hans Aarsleff United States
Karl Ameriks United States
Rik Pinxten Belgium
Arnold J. Pomerans United States
Rob Boddice relative to R. G. Collingwood R. G. Collingwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×
R. G. Collingwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rob Boddice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Boddice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Boddice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Boddice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Boddice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Boddice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Boddice. The network helps show where Rob Boddice may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Rob Boddice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rob Boddice Line = papers co-authored together Rob Boddice links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Emotion, Sense, Experience
Hit paper breakdown →
202073
2 201449
3 201645
4 201837
5 201728
6 201726
7 200925
8
A History of Attitudes and Behaviours Toward Animals in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-century Britain: Anthropocentrism and the Emergence of Animals
200916
9 201114
10 201412
11 202012
12 201611
13 202311
14 201110
15
The Science of Sympathy: Morality, Evolution, and Victorian Civilization
201610
16 20129
17 20118
18 20198
19 20087
20 20215

About Rob Boddice

Rob Boddice is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Law, Management of Technology and Innovation and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 45 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Emotions Research (17 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Animal Law and Welfare (2 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), History of Science and Natural History (1 paper), Medicine, History, and Philosophy (1 paper), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (1 paper) and Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (77 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (20 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations), Law (20 citations) and General Psychology (2 citations). Rob Boddice has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark M. Smith and Peter N. Stearns. Their work appears in journals such as Gender and Education, Revista de Estudios Sociales, Gender & History, Journal of Social History and Social History of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact