Conway Zirkle

1.4k citations
35 papers · 204 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Conway Zirkle

30 papers receiving 154 citations

Peers

Conway Zirkle
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • History and Philosophy of Science 64
  • General Psychology 5
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 8
  • Genetics 31
  • Anthropology 10
Replace Gary Werskey with:
Gary Werskey Australia
Nora Barlow United States
Dov Ospovat United States
Barbara Forrest United States
Karl J. Fink United States
John Farley Canada
John Beatty Canada
Jonathan Hodge United Kingdom
Nikolai Krementsov Canada
Neal C. Gillespie United States
Conway Zirkle relative to Gary Werskey Australia Gary Werskey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Gary Werskey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Conway Zirkle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conway Zirkle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conway Zirkle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conway Zirkle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conway Zirkle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conway Zirkle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conway Zirkle. The network helps show where Conway Zirkle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Conway Zirkle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Conway Zirkle Line = papers co-authored together Conway Zirkle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195934
2 196427
3 196121
4 195918
5 195316
6 195413
7
Early ideas on inbreeding and cross-breeding.
195212
8 196812
9 195110
10 19575
11 19585
12 19553
13 19603
14 19673
15 19522
16 19562
17
The Involuntary Destruction of Science in the USSR
19531
18 19591
19 19621
20 19701

About Conway Zirkle

Conway Zirkle is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Molecular Biology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (6 papers), Evolution and Science Education (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper) and Polar Research and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (64 citations), General Psychology (5 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (8 citations), Genetics (31 citations) and Anthropology (10 citations). Conway Zirkle has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bentley Glass, William L. Straus, Owsei Temkin, John W. Gowen, Edward W. Dempsey, R. D. Lillie, John F. Fulton, I. Bernard Cohen, Carl B. Boyer and Marshall Clagett. Their work appears in journals such as Isis, Science, The American Historical Review, Journal of Heredity and The William and Mary Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact