Ophélia Deroy
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Sensory Systems top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Food Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Charles SpenceDominique ValentinAndy WoodsCarlos VelascoAnne-Sylvie CrisinelMerle T. FairhurstCatherine DacremontGuillaume Dezecache
- Topics
- Multisensory perception and integration (49 papers)Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (28 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
Ophélia Deroy
97 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
- Social Psychology 1.1k
- Sensory Systems 907
- Cognitive Neuroscience 706
- Food Science 411
Countries citing papers authored by Ophélia Deroy
This map shows the geographic impact of Ophélia Deroy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ophélia Deroy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophélia Deroy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ophélia Deroy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ophélia Deroy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ophélia Deroy. The network helps show where Ophélia Deroy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ophélia Deroy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ophélia Deroy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ophélia Deroy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ophélia Deroy. Ophélia Deroy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | Social influence and informational independence. | 4 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | La peur du savoir : sur le relativisme et le constructivisme de la connaissance | 2 |
About Ophélia Deroy
Ophélia Deroy is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (49 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (28 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (907 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations) and Social Psychology (1.1k citations). Ophélia Deroy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Charles Spence, Dominique Valentin, Andy Woods, Carlos Velasco, Anne-Sylvie Crisinel, Merle T. Fairhurst, Catherine Dacremont, Guillaume Dezecache, Malika Auvray and Justin Sulik. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.