Malika Auvray

3.0k total citations
70 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Malika Auvray is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Malika Auvray has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 41 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 16 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Malika Auvray's work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (37 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (35 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers). Malika Auvray is often cited by papers focused on Tactile and Sensory Interactions (37 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (35 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers). Malika Auvray collaborates with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Italy. Malika Auvray's co-authors include Charles Spence, Sylvain Hanneton, Erik Myin, J. Kevin Ο’Regan, John Stewart, Ophélia Deroy, Alberto Gallace, Barthélémy Durette, Kevin O’regan and Charles Lenay and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Malika Auvray

67 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Malika Auvray France	20	1.1k	776	444	320	227	70	1.8k
Richard Höchenberger Germany	12	2.0k 1.8×	840 1.1×	497 1.1×	290 0.9×	91 0.4×	18	3.1k
Ulrik Beierholm United Kingdom	18	1.6k 1.5×	1.3k 1.7×	429 1.0×	594 1.9×	92 0.4×	42	2.2k
Takuji Narumi Japan	27	1.1k 1.0×	466 0.6×	526 1.2×	382 1.2×	1.4k 6.3×	224	2.4k
Christian Kaernbach Germany	17	1.9k 1.7×	960 1.2×	631 1.4×	259 0.8×	176 0.8×	47	3.0k
Daniel Sanabria Spain	29	1.2k 1.1×	931 1.2×	516 1.2×	352 1.1×	72 0.3×	93	2.3k
Shinya Yamamoto Japan	20	1.1k 1.0×	349 0.4×	225 0.5×	127 0.4×	121 0.5×	68	1.9k
Paula J. Durlach United States	25	603 0.6×	246 0.3×	361 0.8×	330 1.0×	64 0.3×	69	1.9k
Tomohiro Tanikawa Japan	24	755 0.7×	370 0.5×	316 0.7×	376 1.2×	1.0k 4.5×	162	2.0k
Niko A. Busch Germany	35	4.5k 4.1×	767 1.0×	290 0.7×	449 1.4×	62 0.3×	94	5.3k
Sylvia D. Kreibig United States	14	1.1k 1.0×	1.3k 1.7×	904 2.0×	153 0.5×	118 0.5×	24	2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Malika Auvray

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malika Auvray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malika Auvray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malika Auvray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malika Auvray

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malika Auvray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malika Auvray. The network helps show where Malika Auvray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Malika Auvray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Malika Auvray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Malika Auvray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Malika Auvray. Malika Auvray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Pélachaud, Catherine, et al.. (2025). Paving the way for social touch at a distance: Sonifying tactile interactions and their underlying emotions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(19). e2407614122–e2407614122.

Bailly, Gilles, et al.. (2024). Tactile sensitivity to missing tones in complex vibrotactile signals. Journal of Neurophysiology. 132(6). 1943–1954. 1 indexed citations

Haliyo, Sinan, et al.. (2024). Study of the Impact of Visual and Haptic Sensory Sensitivities on the Detection of Visuo-Haptic Illusions in Virtual Reality. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 1–15. 1 indexed citations

Pélachaud, Catherine, et al.. (2023). The influence of conversational agents’ role and communication style on user experience. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1266186–1266186. 8 indexed citations

Baiano, Chiara, et al.. (2023). Interoceptive abilities facilitate taking another’s spatial perspective. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 10064–10064. 2 indexed citations

Baiano, Chiara, et al.. (2021). Interactions between interoception and perspective-taking: Current state of research and future directions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 130. 252–262. 20 indexed citations

Kirsch, Louise P., et al.. (2021). Vision shapes tactile spatial perspective taking.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 150(9). 1918–1925. 6 indexed citations

Kirsch, Louise P., et al.. (2021). Spatial perspective-taking: insights from sensory impairments. Experimental Brain Research. 240(1). 27–37. 1 indexed citations

Kirsch, Louise P., et al.. (2019). Spatial perspective taking is related to social intelligence and attachment style. Personality and Individual Differences. 168. 109726–109726. 9 indexed citations

10.

Lafraire, Jérémie, et al.. (2018). The influence of audiovisual stimuli cuing temperature, carbonation, and color on the categorization of freshness in beverages. Journal of Sensory Studies. 33(6). 14 indexed citations

11.

Spence, Charles, et al.. (2017). A unity of the self or a multiplicity of locations? How the graphesthesia task sheds light on the role of spatial perspectives in bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition. 56. 100–114. 20 indexed citations

12.

Auvray, Malika, et al.. (2016). Cognition overrides orientation dependence in tactile viewpoint selection. Experimental Brain Research. 234(7). 1885–1892. 5 indexed citations

13.

Spence, Charles, et al.. (2015). Taking someone else’s spatial perspective: Natural stance or effortful decentring?. Cognition. 148. 27–33. 30 indexed citations

14.

Auvray, Malika, et al.. (2014). How Do Synaesthetes Experience the World?. Oxford University Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations

15.

Hartcher-O’Brien, Jess & Malika Auvray. (2014). The Process of Distal Attribution Illuminated Through Studies of Sensory Substitution. Multisensory Research. 27(5-6). 421–441. 23 indexed citations

16.

Auvray, Malika & Marieke Rohde. (2012). Perceptual crossing: the simplest online paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 6. 181–181. 37 indexed citations

17.

Auvray, Malika, Alberto Gallace, Jess Hartcher-O’Brien, Hong Z. Tan, & Charles Spence. (2008). Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips. Brain Research. 1213. 111–119. 24 indexed citations

18.

Auvray, Malika, Sylvain Hanneton, & J. Kevin Ο’Regan. (2007). Learning to Perceive with a Visuo — Auditory Substitution System: Localisation and Object Recognition with ‘The Voice’. Perception. 36(3). 416–430. 188 indexed citations

19.

Auvray, Malika & Charles Spence. (2007). The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition. 17(3). 1016–1031. 397 indexed citations

20.

Auvray, Malika & J. Kevin Ο’Regan. (2001). Influence of semantic factors on blindness to progressive changes in visual scenes. Perception. 30. 0–0. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact