Noah P. Barsky
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Accounting top 10%
- Topics
- Accounting and Organizational Management (5 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers)Big Data and Business Intelligence (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Information SystemsStrategy and ManagementManagement Science and Operations Research
- Journals
- Accounting Auditing & Accountability JournalR and D ManagementCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
Noah P. Barsky
10 papers receiving 224 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Strategy and Management 140
- Management Information Systems 98
- Management Science and Operations Research 57
- Economics and Econometrics 48
- Accounting 44
Countries citing papers authored by Noah P. Barsky
This map shows the geographic impact of Noah P. Barsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah P. Barsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah P. Barsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noah P. Barsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah P. Barsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah P. Barsky. The network helps show where Noah P. Barsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noah P. Barsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noah P. Barsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noah P. Barsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noah P. Barsky. Noah P. Barsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Corporate Budgeting: Perceptions of a Next Generation of Corporate Leaders | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | A Core/Periphery Structure in a Corporate Budgeting Process | 9 |
| 11 | Utilizing the Balanced Scorecard for R&D Performance Measurement | 28 |
| 12 | 153 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 26 |
About Noah P. Barsky
Noah P. Barsky is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 17 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (5 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (98 citations), Strategy and Management (140 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (57 citations). Noah P. Barsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Wayne G. Bremser, Anthony H. Catanach, Mike Clements, Kelly Smith and Stephen J. Andriole. Their work appears in journals such as Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, R and D Management and Communications of the Association for Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.