Noah Lim

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
32 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Noah Lim is a scholar working on Safety Research, Marketing and General Decision Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Noah Lim has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Safety Research, 10 papers in Marketing and 10 papers in General Decision Sciences. Recurrent topics in Noah Lim's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (20 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (10 papers). Noah Lim is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (20 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (10 papers). Noah Lim collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Hong Kong. Noah Lim's co-authors include Teck‐Hua Ho, Tony Haitao Cui, Colin F. Camerer, Hua Chen, Hua Chen, Hua Chen, Xiaoyu Xia, Wei Jie Seow, Lina Ang and Wilfred Amaldoss and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, The Science of The Total Environment and Management Science.

In The Last Decade

Noah Lim

27 papers receiving 984 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Evaluating SoJump.com as a tool for online behavioral research in China

2024 32 citations Lina Ang, Noah Lim et al. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Noah Lim United States	15	378	344	340	314	239	32	1.0k
Tanjim Hossain Canada	13	346 0.9×	468 1.4×	343 1.0×	55 0.2×	469 2.0×	29	1.2k
Jonathan H. Grenier United States	16	222 0.6×	151 0.4×	68 0.2×	144 0.5×	264 1.1×	37	1.4k
Giacomo Calzolari Italy	18	255 0.7×	131 0.4×	366 1.1×	167 0.5×	591 2.5×	68	1.2k
Kathryn E. Spier United States	20	247 0.7×	207 0.6×	496 1.5×	205 0.7×	1.4k 5.7×	74	2.0k
Mo Xiao United States	11	227 0.6×	82 0.2×	137 0.4×	48 0.2×	241 1.0×	27	612
Dennis Campbell United States	14	250 0.7×	85 0.2×	71 0.2×	209 0.7×	209 0.9×	50	932
Monic Sun United States	12	777 2.1×	47 0.1×	218 0.6×	117 0.4×	108 0.5×	27	1.2k
Richard A. Briesch United States	13	1.4k 3.6×	29 0.1×	320 0.9×	118 0.4×	559 2.3×	23	1.7k
Margaret H. Christ United States	16	30 0.1×	226 0.7×	103 0.3×	365 1.2×	94 0.4×	35	1.0k
Ruskin M. Morgan United States	5	88 0.2×	34 0.1×	172 0.5×	117 0.4×	126 0.5×	6	588

Countries citing papers authored by Noah Lim

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Lim

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Lim. The network helps show where Noah Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noah Lim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noah Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noah Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noah Lim. Noah Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Lim, Noah, et al.. (2025). Job Security, Gender, and Sales Performance: Evidence from a Retail Sales Context. Marketing Science. 45(1). 80–107.

2.

Ang, Lina, et al.. (2024). Evaluating SoJump.com as a tool for online behavioral research in China. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. 41. 100905–100905. 32 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Lim, Noah, et al.. (2024). Decentralized voluntary agreements do not reduce emissions in a climate change experiment. Ecological Economics. 227. 108438–108438.

4.

Lim, Noah, et al.. (2023). Information about historical emissions drives the division of climate change mitigation costs. Nature Communications. 14(1). 1408–1408. 8 indexed citations

5.

Ang, Lina, et al.. (2022). Change of air quality knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and practices during and post-wildfires in the United States. The Science of The Total Environment. 836. 155432–155432. 12 indexed citations

6.

Li, Lianjun, et al.. (2022). Association of Use of Electronic Appointment Reminders With Waiting Times in the Veterans Affairs Health System. JAMA Network Open. 5(2). e2148593–e2148593. 1 indexed citations

7.

Ang, Lina, et al.. (2021). Development and validation of a new scale to assess air quality knowledge (AQIQ). Environmental Pollution. 299. 118750–118750. 5 indexed citations

8.

DeScioli, Peter, et al.. (2021). One-way routes complicate cooperation in migrant crises. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 13529–13529. 1 indexed citations

9.

Yeung, Catherine, et al.. (2021). Cash incentives for weight loss work only for males. Behavioural Public Policy. 8(2). 279–299. 2 indexed citations

10.

Lim, Noah, et al.. (2019). Third-Party Reviews and Quality Provision. Management Science. 65(6). 2695–2716. 16 indexed citations

11.

Ho, Teck‐Hua, et al.. (2017). OM Forum—Causal Inference Models in Operations Management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 19(4). 509–525. 67 indexed citations

12.

Chen, Hua & Noah Lim. (2016). How Does Team Composition Affect Effort in Contests? A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research. 54(1). 44–60. 19 indexed citations

13.

Lim, Noah, et al.. (2015). The Effect of Identity Disclosure on Reliability and Efforts Provision in Online Review Systems. Americas Conference on Information Systems. 1 indexed citations

14.

Lim, Noah, et al.. (2013). Relationship Organization and Price Delegation: An Experimental Study. Management Science. 60(3). 586–605. 17 indexed citations

15.

Chen, Hua, et al.. (2011). Designing Multiperson Tournaments with Asymmetric Contestants: An Experimental Study. Management Science. 57(5). 864–883. 58 indexed citations

16.

Goldfarb, Avi, Teck‐Hua Ho, Wilfred Amaldoss, et al.. (2011). Behavioral Models of Managerial Decision-Making. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations

17.

Lim, Noah. (2010). Social Loss Aversion and Optimal Contest Design. Journal of Marketing Research. 47(4). 777–787. 66 indexed citations

18.

Ho, Teck‐Hua, Noah Lim, & Tony Haitao Cui. (2010). Reference-Dependence in Multi-Location Newsvendor Models: A Structural Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. 17 indexed citations

19.

Amaldoss, Wilfred, Teck‐Hua Ho, Aradhna Krishna, et al.. (2008). Experiments on Strategic Choice and Markets. 2 indexed citations

20.

Ho, Teck‐Hua, Noah Lim, & Colin F. Camerer. (2006). How “Psychological” Should Economic and Marketing Models Be?. Journal of Marketing Research. 43(3). 341–344. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact