Mo Xiao

25 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Mo Xiao
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Marketing 227
  • General Decision Sciences 35
  • Management Science and Operations Research 137
  • Safety Research 82
  • Strategy and Management 143
Replace Wesley R. Hartmann with:
Wesley R. Hartmann United States
Tore Nilssen Norway
Thomas D. Jeitschko United States
Ulrich Heimeshoff Germany
Bo Cowgill United States
Dennis Campbell United States
Ramón Caminal Spain
Ralf Dewenter Germany
Michaela Draganska United States
Jonathan Reuter United States
Mo Xiao relative to Wesley R. Hartmann United States Wesley R. Hartmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Wesley R. Hartmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mo Xiao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mo Xiao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mo Xiao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mo Xiao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mo Xiao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mo Xiao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mo Xiao. The network helps show where Mo Xiao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mo Xiao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mo Xiao Line = papers co-authored together Mo Xiao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011136
2 201175
3 201167
4 201665
5 201047
6 201246
7 202132
8 201029
9 202023
10 201521
11
The Impact of Minimum Quality Standards on Firm Entry, Exit and Product Quality: The Case of the Child Care Market
200511
12 20209
13 20059
14 20197
15 20117
16 20196
17 20055
18 20154
19 20203
20 20213

About Mo Xiao

Mo Xiao is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Management Science and Operations Research, Media Technology and Strategy and Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (14 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (12 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (6 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (6 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (4 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (227 citations), General Decision Sciences (35 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (137 citations), Safety Research (82 citations) and Strategy and Management (143 citations). Mo Xiao has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include V. Joseph Hotz, Avi Goldfarb, Ying Fan, Peter F. Orazem, Jiandong Ju, Zaiyan Wei, Yuyu Chen, Mitsuru Igami, Masayuki Sawada and Rong Rong. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Industrial Organization, The RAND Journal of Economics, American Economic Review, Review of Industrial Organization and Economic Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact