Nina Hansen
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sabine OttenKai SassenbergLuzia HeuRobert LensinkMartijn van ZomerenRuth van VeelenNandini NayakBarry McLaughlin
- Topics
- Cultural Differences and Values (21 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers)Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaWorld DevelopmentComputers & Education
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nina Hansen
45 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Social Psychology 529
- Sociology and Political Science 529
- Gender Studies 233
- Economics and Econometrics 165
- Health 148
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Hansen
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Hansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Hansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Hansen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Hansen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Hansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Hansen. The network helps show where Nina Hansen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Hansen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Hansen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Hansen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Hansen. Nina Hansen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 127 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 171 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | Stereotype, Vorurteile und soziale Diskriminierung: Theorie, Befunde und Interventionen | 4 |
| 18 | 57 | |
| 19 | Optimization and performance of Space Station Freedom solar cells | 4 |
| 20 | 90 |
About Nina Hansen
Nina Hansen is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (21 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers) and Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (62 citations), Social Psychology (529 citations) and Gender Studies (233 citations). Nina Hansen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sabine Otten, Kai Sassenberg, Luzia Heu, Robert Lensink, Martijn van Zomeren, Ruth van Veelen, Nandini Nayak, Barry McLaughlin, Tom Postmes and Mara Cadinu. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, World Development and Computers & Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.