Nikki Shure

517 total citations
23 papers, 224 citations indexed

About

Nikki Shure is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Nikki Shure has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 224 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Education, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Nikki Shure's work include Higher Education Research Studies (6 papers), School Choice and Performance (6 papers) and Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (5 papers). Nikki Shure is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Research Studies (6 papers), School Choice and Performance (6 papers) and Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (5 papers). Nikki Shure collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Hungary. Nikki Shure's co-authors include Morag Henderson, John Jerrim, Shaun Scholes, Meg Fluharty, David Bann, Jake Anders, Philip D. Parker, Jiesi Guo, Herbert W. Marsh and Lindsey Macmillan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Developmental Psychology and American Educational Research Journal.

In The Last Decade

Nikki Shure

19 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nikki Shure United Kingdom	9	102	59	31	30	30	23	224
Deirdre McGillicuddy Ireland	9	223 2.2×	72 1.2×	25 0.8×	21 0.7×	16 0.5×	20	332
Charlotte A. Agger United States	11	164 1.6×	58 1.0×	31 1.0×	56 1.9×	17 0.6×	19	310
Weidong Wang China	8	58 0.6×	66 1.1×	48 1.5×	64 2.1×	62 2.1×	16	302
Petra A. Robinson United States	8	111 1.1×	40 0.7×	22 0.7×	38 1.3×	8 0.3×	36	237
JeongAe You South Korea	9	88 0.9×	103 1.7×	47 1.5×	61 2.0×	11 0.4×	69	266
Ana Ponce de León Elizondo Spain	9	54 0.5×	88 1.5×	25 0.8×	99 3.3×	9 0.3×	64	279
Heejun Lim Canada	7	98 1.0×	69 1.2×	45 1.5×	39 1.3×	4 0.1×	44	292
Karen Huchting United States	9	49 0.5×	43 0.7×	23 0.7×	51 1.7×	15 0.5×	17	388
Laura Buijs Netherlands	10	46 0.5×	115 1.9×	78 2.5×	23 0.8×	22 0.7×	12	279
Kristen Ferguson Canada	8	158 1.5×	31 0.5×	26 0.8×	103 3.4×	15 0.5×	19	336

Countries citing papers authored by Nikki Shure

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikki Shure's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikki Shure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikki Shure more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikki Shure

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikki Shure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikki Shure. The network helps show where Nikki Shure may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nikki Shure

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nikki Shure. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nikki Shure based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nikki Shure. Nikki Shure is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ilieva, Roumiana, et al.. (2025). Revisiting the Dunning-Kruger effect: Composite measures and heterogeneity by gender. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 116. 102362–102362. 2 indexed citations

Jerrim, John, et al.. (2025). Peers, parents, and self-perceptions: the gender gap in mathematics self-assessment. Journal of Population Economics. 38(1). 33–33.

Schoon, Ingrid, et al.. (2025). Educational aspirations and inequality in an expanding higher education system: evidence from South Korea. Higher Education.

Jerrim, John, et al.. (2024). Teacher Self-Efficacy, Instructional Practice, and Student Outcomes: Evidence from the TALIS Video Study. American Educational Research Journal. 62(2). 378–413.

Henderson, Morag, et al.. (2023). Intergenerational educational mobility – The role of non-cognitive skills. Education Economics. 32(1). 59–78. 5 indexed citations

Jerrim, John, Philip D. Parker, & Nikki Shure. (2023). Overclaiming. An international investigation using PISA data. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice. 30(5-6). 351–371. 1 indexed citations

Shure, Nikki & Larissa Zierow. (2023). High Achieving First-Generation University Students. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Parker, Philip D., Taren Sanders, Jake Anders, et al.. (2022). School socioeconomic status context and social adjustment in children.. Developmental Psychology. 59(1). 15–29. 5 indexed citations

Shure, Nikki, et al.. (2022). The gender gap in top jobs – The role of overconfidence. Labour Economics. 79. 102283–102283. 7 indexed citations

10.

Shure, Nikki. (2021). Non-cognitive peer effects in secondary education. Labour Economics. 73. 102074–102074. 15 indexed citations

11.

Henderson, Morag, et al.. (2020). Moving on up: ‘first in family’ university graduates in England. Oxford Review of Education. 46(6). 734–751. 24 indexed citations

12.

Parker, Philip D., Taren Sanders, Jake Anders, et al.. (2020). Does school average achievement explain the effect of socioeconomic status on math and reading interest? A test of the Information Distortion Model. Learning and Instruction. 73. 101432–101432. 6 indexed citations

13.

Henderson, Morag, et al.. (2020). Is ‘first in family’ a good indicator for widening university participation?. Economics of Education Review. 78. 102038–102038. 13 indexed citations

14.

Anders, Jake, et al.. (2020). Is Canada really an education superpower? The impact of non-participation on results from PISA 2015. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability. 33(1). 229–249. 19 indexed citations

15.

Bann, David, Shaun Scholes, Meg Fluharty, & Nikki Shure. (2019). Adolescents’ physical activity: cross-national comparisons of levels, distributions and disparities across 52 countries. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 16(1). 141–141. 60 indexed citations

16.

Shure, Nikki. (2019). School Hours and Maternal Labor Supply. Kyklos. 72(1). 118–151. 3 indexed citations

17.

Macmillan, Lindsey, Paul Gregg, John Jerrim, & Nikki Shure. (2018). Children in jobless households across Europe: evidence on the association with medium- and long-term outcomes. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice. 26(3). 335–358. 11 indexed citations

18.

Jerrim, John, Philip D. Parker, Álvaro Choi, et al.. (2018). How Robust Are Cross‐Country Comparisons of PISA Scores to the Scaling Model Used?. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 37(4). 28–39. 15 indexed citations

19.

Parker, Philip D., Herbert W. Marsh, Jiesi Guo, et al.. (2017). An information distortion model of social class differences in math self-concept, intrinsic value, and utility value.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 110(3). 445–463. 16 indexed citations

20.

Jerrim, John & Nikki Shure. (2016). Achievement of 15-Year-Olds in England: PISA 2015 National Report: December 2016. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact