Nicole S. Harth
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Marketing top 10%
- Co-authors
- Colin Wayne LeachThomas KesslerMatthew J. HornseyFiona Kate BarlowKristin MitteNurit ShnabelTobias RegnerDana Schneider
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers)COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers)Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers)
- Journals
- Personality and Social Psychology BulletinJournal of Environmental PsychologyCurrent Opinion in Psychology
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Nicole S. Harth
13 papers receiving 540 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Sociology and Political Science 360
- Social Psychology 234
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 179
- Applied Psychology 103
- Marketing 91
Countries citing papers authored by Nicole S. Harth
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole S. Harth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole S. Harth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole S. Harth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole S. Harth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole S. Harth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole S. Harth. The network helps show where Nicole S. Harth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicole S. Harth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicole S. Harth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicole S. Harth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicole S. Harth. Nicole S. Harth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | Us and the virus: understanding the COVID-19 pandemic through a social psychological lens | 3 |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 253 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | Other-regarding behaviour: Testing guilt- and reciprocity-based models | 1 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 157 |
About Nicole S. Harth
Nicole S. Harth is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 13 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (103 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (179 citations) and Social Psychology (234 citations). Nicole S. Harth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Colin Wayne Leach, Thomas Kessler, Matthew J. Hornsey, Fiona Kate Barlow, Kristin Mitte, Nurit Shnabel, Tobias Regner, Dana Schneider, Ilka H. Gleibs and Selma C. Rudert. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Environmental Psychology and Current Opinion in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.