Nicolas Van der Linden

1.1k citations
19 papers · 423 indexed · h-index 11

Nicolas Van der Linden

19 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Nicolas Van der Linden
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • General Health Professions 239
  • Clinical Psychology 123
  • Social Psychology 114
  • Safety Research 38
  • Education 109
Replace Gentiane Boudrenghien with:
Gentiane Boudrenghien Belgium
Lucinda S. Spaulding United States
Kate Reid United Kingdom
Tânia Moreira Portugal
Jenna Vekkaila Finland
Kelly Marshall Australia
Kelsey L. Deane New Zealand
Lotta Tikkanen Finland
Keisha M. Love United States
Whitney DeCamp United States
Nicolas Van der Linden relative to Gentiane Boudrenghien Belgium Gentiane Boudrenghien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Gentiane Boudrenghien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Van der Linden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Van der Linden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Van der Linden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Van der Linden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Van der Linden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Van der Linden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Van der Linden. The network helps show where Nicolas Van der Linden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicolas Van der Linden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicolas Van der Linden Line = papers co-authored together Nicolas Van der Linden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 202324
2 20228
3 20224
4 202210
5
Drugs at the festivals: Perceptions of prevention, harm reduction, care, and law enforcement strategies
20211
6 20202
7 20191
8 201823
9 201861
10 201711
11 201621
12 2016134
13
Behind the screen conspirators: Paranoid social cognition in an online age
20158
14 201535
15 201325
16 201110
17 201128
18
Recognition of shared past sufferings, trust and improving intergroup attitudes in Belgium
201010
19 20107

About Nicolas Van der Linden

Nicolas Van der Linden is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Toxicology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Peace and Human Rights Education (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (239 citations), Clinical Psychology (123 citations) and Social Psychology (114 citations). Nicolas Van der Linden has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Olivier Klein, Mariane Frenay, Benoît Galand, Christelle Devos, Gentiane Boudrenghien, Assaad Elia Azzi, Robin Wollast, Laurent Licata, Boris Bizumić and Rune Stubager. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Studies in Higher Education and Political Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026