Aleksandra Cichocka

15.9k total citations · 3 hit papers
95 papers, 5.1k citations indexed

About

Aleksandra Cichocka is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Aleksandra Cichocka has authored 95 papers receiving a total of 5.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 75 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 44 papers in Social Psychology and 30 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Aleksandra Cichocka's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (47 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (27 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (26 papers). Aleksandra Cichocka is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (47 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (27 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (26 papers). Aleksandra Cichocka collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and United States. Aleksandra Cichocka's co-authors include Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, Marta Marchlewska, Aleksandra Cisłak, Joseph E. Uscinski, Farzin Deravi, Türkay Salim Nefes, Chee Siang Ang and Michał Bilewicz and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Psychological Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Aleksandra Cichocka

86 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Hit Papers

Understanding Conspiracy ... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2019 2017 2025 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Aleksandra Cichocka United Kingdom 33 4.4k 1.3k 1.2k 981 745 95 5.1k
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen Netherlands 43 4.9k 1.1× 1.2k 0.9× 1.9k 1.6× 621 0.6× 895 1.2× 163 6.3k
Eran Halperin Israel 41 3.9k 0.9× 2.5k 1.9× 876 0.7× 707 0.7× 213 0.3× 192 5.4k
Agnieszka Golec de Zavala United Kingdom 29 2.4k 0.5× 1.1k 0.8× 533 0.4× 772 0.8× 225 0.3× 65 2.9k
Jack Glaser United States 19 3.8k 0.9× 2.0k 1.5× 946 0.8× 399 0.4× 242 0.3× 40 5.1k
Mark J. Brandt Netherlands 33 2.5k 0.6× 1.7k 1.3× 984 0.8× 268 0.3× 250 0.3× 118 3.8k
Christopher M. Federico United States 34 3.6k 0.8× 1.6k 1.2× 650 0.5× 275 0.3× 182 0.2× 85 4.7k
Hugo Mercier France 26 1.8k 0.4× 782 0.6× 858 0.7× 156 0.2× 242 0.3× 124 4.0k
Robin L. Nabi United States 38 3.2k 0.7× 1.4k 1.1× 423 0.3× 559 0.6× 302 0.4× 80 6.2k
Martin Bruder Germany 17 1.4k 0.3× 661 0.5× 550 0.5× 206 0.2× 294 0.4× 34 2.0k
Spassena Koleva United States 15 2.0k 0.5× 1.7k 1.3× 1.9k 1.5× 372 0.4× 217 0.3× 20 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Aleksandra Cichocka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aleksandra Cichocka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aleksandra Cichocka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aleksandra Cichocka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aleksandra Cichocka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aleksandra Cichocka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aleksandra Cichocka. The network helps show where Aleksandra Cichocka may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aleksandra Cichocka

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aleksandra Cichocka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aleksandra Cichocka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aleksandra Cichocka. Aleksandra Cichocka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Biddlestone, Mikey, Ricky Green, Karen M. Douglas, et al.. (2025). Reasons to believe: A systematic review and meta-analytic synthesis of the motives associated with conspiracy beliefs.. Psychological Bulletin. 151(1). 48–87. 13 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Sutton, Robbie M., Flávio Azevedo, Aleksandra Cichocka, et al.. (2025). WITHDRAWN. PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
3.
Formanowicz, Magdalena, et al.. (2025). Moral Outrage Predicts the Virality of Petitions for Change on Social Media, But Not the Number of Signatures They Receive. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 17(2). 194–203.
4.
Krumrei-Mancuso, Elizabeth J., Philip Pärnamets, Aleksandra Cichocka, et al.. (2024). Toward an understanding of collective intellectual humility. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 29(1). 15–27. 4 indexed citations
5.
Imhoff, Roland, Aleksandra Cichocka, Biljana Gjoneska, & Olivier Klein. (2024). Not All Conspiracy Theories Are Created Equal. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 232(1). 3–6. 1 indexed citations
6.
Cichocka, Aleksandra, et al.. (2024). Gender disparities in social and personality psychology awards from 1968 to 2021. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1).
7.
Greifeneder, Rainer, Karen M. Douglas, Aleksandra Cichocka, et al.. (2024). Does Lower Psychological Need Satisfaction Foster Conspiracy Belief? Longitudinal Effects Over 3 Years in New Zealand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 52(4). 1004–1018. 3 indexed citations
8.
Soral, Wiktor, Marcin Bukowski, Michał Bilewicz, et al.. (2024). Prolonged unemployment is associated with control loss and personal as well as social disengagement. Journal of Personality. 92(6). 1704–1725. 3 indexed citations
9.
Marchlewska, Marta, et al.. (2024). Avoidance coping explains the link between narcissism and counternormative tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology. 64(2). e12816–e12816.
11.
Gronfeldt, Bjarki, et al.. (2023). Party people: Differentiating the associations of partisan identification and partisan narcissism with political skill, integrity, and party dedication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 53(12). 1227–1239. 3 indexed citations
12.
Gronfeldt, Bjarki, et al.. (2023). Double trouble: How sectarian and national narcissism relate differently to collective violence beliefs in Lebanon. Aggressive Behavior. 49(6). 669–678. 6 indexed citations
13.
Marques, Mathew D., Stephen Hill, Matt N Williams, et al.. (2022). Democracy and belief in conspiracy theories in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Political Science. 57(3). 264–279. 11 indexed citations
14.
Seyd, Ben, et al.. (2020). Decision Responsiveness and the Legitimacy of Public Agencies. Parliamentary Affairs. 75(2). 449–467. 3 indexed citations
15.
Cichocka, Aleksandra. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology. 27(1). 283–317. 138 indexed citations
16.
Cichocka, Aleksandra. (2013). Cukrzyca typu 2. Cz. II. Produkty spożywcze wskazane w diecie. PRZEMYSŁ SPOŻYWCZY.
17.
Zavala, Agnieszka Golec de, Aleksandra Cichocka, & Irena Iskra‐Golec. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 104(6). 1019–1039. 124 indexed citations
18.
Cichocka, Aleksandra, et al.. (2008). Dietary treatment in adult diabetic patients. Clinical Diabetology. 9(1). 18–27.
19.
Cichocka, Aleksandra. (2005). Dieta śródziemnomorska w profilaktyce pierwotnej choroby niedokrwiennej serca. Via Medica Journals. 1(3). 30–39.
20.
Cichocka, Aleksandra. (2004). Otylosc - epidemia XXI wieku. PRZEMYSŁ SPOŻYWCZY. 58(7). 6–9. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026