Nickolas C. Smith

569 citations
18 papers · 414 indexed · h-index 10

Nickolas C. Smith

17 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Nickolas C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 195
  • Social Psychology 162
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 118
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 104
  • Applied Psychology 64
Replace Alister McCormick with:
Alister McCormick United Kingdom
Selen Razón United States
Noel P. Kinrade United Kingdom
Yannis Zervas Greece
Noel Brick United Kingdom
Linda Schücker Germany
Mohammad VaezMousavi Iran
Guilherme Guimarães Bevilacqua Brazil
Walter Staiano Spain
Kelly J. Ashford United Kingdom
Nickolas C. Smith relative to Alister McCormick United Kingdom Alister McCormick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Alister McCormick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nickolas C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nickolas C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nickolas C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nickolas C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nickolas C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nickolas C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nickolas C. Smith. The network helps show where Nickolas C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nickolas C. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nickolas C. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nickolas C. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nickolas C. Smith. Nickolas C. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 14
3 11
4 3
5 6
6 8
7 102
8
Disruption to imagery perspective following stroke: implications for kinesthesis and rehabilitation.
1
9 8
10
A test of the predictions of processing efficiency theory during elite team competition using the Thought Occurrence Questionnaire for Sport
9
11 64
12 95
13 15
14 23
15 10
16 14
17 26
18 5

About Nickolas C. Smith

Nickolas C. Smith is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (7 papers) and Sport Psychology and Performance (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (195 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (118 citations) and Applied Psychology (64 citations). Nickolas C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. Holmes, Mark Wilson, Joe Causer, A. Mark Williams, D.E. Marple-Horvat, Michael J. Ford, Zoë C. Franklin, Mark Chattington, Neil Fowler and Louise Wallace. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026